From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] http-push: push : deletes remote branch Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:25:10 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <20080218130726.GA26854@localhost> <20080218155546.GA8934@localhost> <20080219125840.GA14049@localhost> <20080219132410.GA6553@glandium.org> <7v4pc4iq94.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Mike Hommey , Clemens Buchacher , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 19 23:26:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JRauY-0001Ti-DU for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:26:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759592AbYBSWZ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:25:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759268AbYBSWZ0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:25:26 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:36211 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756254AbYBSWZZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:25:25 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2008 22:25:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 19 Feb 2008 23:25:23 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18gAhtJjtkgFj/XmI6Ysz1iMjDYZL0WsvsoE7am5O qTg6lmryRS0R9U X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7v4pc4iq94.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > I think this would not be too much of a hassle. These days, an > > Apache2 is installed on many machines, and it is better to have tests, > > than to have no tests, even if they are not exercised everywhere, > > right? > > I think a sensible guideline would be: > > - the core tools are tested by default everywhere; > > - i18n bits and foreign SCM interface are tested by default, > but should allow opting-out; > > - networking test that needs to open listening ports should be > off by default but should allow opting-in. Fair enough. Although there is nothing there to debate about, yet. Ciao, Dscho