From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix "git push $there +HEAD" Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:02:19 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <7vprurc3n8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Steffen Prohaska , Daniel Barkalow To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 20 14:03:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JRobU-0005GK-4i for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:03:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763470AbYBTNCj (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:02:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763440AbYBTNCi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:02:38 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:48745 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1760444AbYBTNCh (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:02:37 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2008 13:02:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 20 Feb 2008 14:02:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/lyNNxBtblEFCp4TwjLCGIxb794VkvOO02m2mIhQ xiG6ZHuIFzCQGK X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7vprurc3n8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > An earlier commit 47d996a (push: support pushing HEAD to real branch > name) added support for "git push $there HEAD" by introducing a rewrite > rule for the refspecs obtained from the command line. However, unlike > the usual refspecs, it did not allow prefixing with '+' to mean forcing > the branch. Heh. I realised that yesterday, and put it in my TODO list. Thanks for doing it for me! ;-) The patch looks obviously correct to me. Ciao, Dscho