From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-submodule: Don't die when command fails for one submodule Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:13:31 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <1204641314-2726-1-git-send-email-pkufranky@gmail.com> <46dff0320803040800o499bb77bsa033134bda43becb@mail.gmail.com> <46dff0320803040806y5ed02b86p9216ddc752f3052@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Ping Yin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 04 17:14:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWZn6-0000rP-3Y for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:14:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763774AbYCDQOT (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:14:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762732AbYCDQOS (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:14:18 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:36746 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1760224AbYCDQOS (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:14:18 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Mar 2008 16:14:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 04 Mar 2008 17:14:16 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19sobVkF79smWyHUawtxjVzbrOGD+EvgubJBQXbcI r0tCyaTzEbd4dK X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <46dff0320803040806y5ed02b86p9216ddc752f3052@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Ping Yin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Ping Yin wrote: > > > > > The error output is not lost and is in module_name > > > > That's what I am saying: the error output is not enough. The exit status > > needs to indicate that there was an error, too. Everything else is > > unusable by scripts. > > I think this can be done in a following patch which capture any error > and give the right exit status. That's horrible! Are you seriously suggesting breaking a perfectly fine paradigm in one patch, just to fix it in the next one? *Shudders*, Dscho