From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/40] Add target architecture MinGW. Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:06:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <1204138503-6126-1-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at> <200803112230.57004.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> <200803122359.30411.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 13 00:06:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZa1x-0008EA-Mb for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:06:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751585AbYCLXGB (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:06:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752232AbYCLXGB (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:06:01 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:39369 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751059AbYCLXGA (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:06:00 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2008 23:05:59 -0000 Received: from host86-138-198-40.range86-138.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.138.198.40] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 13 Mar 2008 00:05:59 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/WFLoD4jjWoB3MnY8sgX8tUEMaohpNmidlUSljRd okgcMKEs27JG51 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <200803122359.30411.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Johannes Sixt wrote: > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 00:28, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > > On the positive side, we can now reuse Michal's vsnprintf wrapper, > > > which fixes snprintf, too, (which was not the case previously). Note > > > that on Windows we have to adjust the size parameter. > > > > Actually, I have to admit that I like strbuf_vaddf() more and more. > > Anything you would wish me to implement there? > > Only that you keep an eye on PRIuMAX; if it is ever used in a format > string of strbuf_vaddf() then you ought to implement %I64u as well as > %llu. ;) Sure! Ciao, Dscho