From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Working copy revision and push pain Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:00:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <47E64F71.3020204@jwatt.org> <47E658D3.1060104@jwatt.org> <51419b2c0803230645l5b07bbf5h9cbf9b6f47373efa@mail.gmail.com> <47E6612A.5020408@jwatt.org> <51419b2c0803230706w5ff88fc7oc7e8e34ab8afa1fd@mail.gmail.com> <47E66DAA.4080807@jwatt.org> <47E6765D.2020103@jwatt.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Elijah Newren , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Watt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 23 17:01:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JdSd1-0004YR-LU for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:01:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753247AbYCWQAR (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:00:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753051AbYCWQAQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:00:16 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:53735 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752722AbYCWQAO (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:00:14 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2008 16:00:12 -0000 Received: from host86-148-26-43.range86-148.btcentralplus.com (EHLO racer.home) [86.148.26.43] by mail.gmx.net (mp051) with SMTP; 23 Mar 2008 17:00:12 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19GeKg/23BGjNXFXoVemmevF9fWU1/L/brZBumjLm jiwAORWMh/D7B3 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <47E6765D.2020103@jwatt.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Jonathan Watt wrote: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > Just to give you a small clue what other people would like: > > http://utsl.gen.nz/git/post-update > > > > BTW that was in the link I sent you earlier. > > As I said, I don't want to update the files in the working copy. Seems > like a different issue to me. I understood that. *yawns* But I tried to tell you (unsuccessfully, it seems) that this is not desirable to all users, and therefore it would be a horrible, horrible idea to force the behaviour on other people you seemed to try to force on other people. 'nuff said, Dscho