From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] t9600-cvsimport.sh: set HOME before checking for cvsps availability Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:07:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20080326173420.16383.qmail@4b0e1e5c705f62.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <7v8x05e5fa.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080327032834.GA5417@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Gerrit Pape , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 27 12:09:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JepyM-0007MI-8C for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:08:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756026AbYC0LIA (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:08:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755727AbYC0LH7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:07:59 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:48244 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755271AbYC0LH7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:07:59 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2008 11:07:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 27 Mar 2008 12:07:57 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/o1HJ1ED3oeA/exiVARsdmMzcohwGF+RRtDAZWVt Ctghi+FeT5seTB X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <20080327032834.GA5417@coredump.intra.peff.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LSU 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Jeff King wrote: > However, I still think setting HOME is a good idea, because it > eliminates one more variable in test runs. In particular, I know I have > gotten cvsps into a funny state that was resolved by removing the > ~/.cvsps cache. So it's probably worth doing as a preventative measure, > even if it doesn't fix a specific bug. Yes, I did not think about 3rd party configurations when I removed that HOME setting. Bad me. Ciao, Dscho