From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: Adjust note to --shared for new pruning behavior of git-gc
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 22:01:48 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0804032200310.4008@racer.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F54342.1040901@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Brandon Casey wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Brandon Casey wrote:
> >
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/git-clone.txt b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
> >> index 9758243..d3ab00b 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/git-clone.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
> >> @@ -65,10 +65,12 @@ OPTIONS
> >> +
> >> *NOTE*: this is a possibly dangerous operation; do *not* use
> >> it unless you understand what it does. If you clone your
> >> -repository using this option, then delete branches in the
> >> -source repository and then run linkgit:git-gc[1] using the
> >> -'--prune' option in the source repository, it may remove
> >> -objects which are referenced by the cloned repository.
> >> +repository using this option and then delete branches in the
> >> +source repository, some objects may become unreferenced (or dangling).
> >> +These objects may be removed by normal git operations (such as git-commit[1])
> >> +which automatically call git-gc[1]. If these objects are removed and
> >> +were referenced by the cloned repository, then the cloned repository
> >> +will become corrupt.
> >
> > Please note that if you delete a branch _after_ running git-gc, the next
> > git-gc would remove those objects anyway, since the first git-gc packed
> > the objects, and they were therefore no longer dangling.
>
> I thought they would be retained unless --prune was used. git-gc uses the
> -A option to repack when --prune is not used and -a when --prune is used.
Oh, you're right. I forgot.
> But what I was really trying to point out in the documentation changes
> was that now _other_ commands such as git-commit are also unsafe since
> they call 'git-gc --auto' and could cause loose unreferenced objects to
> be deleted. So it is not enough to just avoid calling git-gc when
> dealing with a --shared repository.
Right. Hmm. I missed that completely when I thought about prune
--expire.
Sorry,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-03 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-03 18:26 [PATCH] git-clone.txt: Adjust note to --shared for new pruning behavior of git-gc Brandon Casey
2008-04-03 19:14 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-03 20:51 ` Brandon Casey
2008-04-03 20:01 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2008-04-04 6:49 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-04-04 14:25 ` Brandon Casey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.1.00.0804032200310.4008@racer.site \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=casey@nrlssc.navy.mil \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox