From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A084737268C for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 05:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.145 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788933486; cv=none; b=DAFp1orOu1q53dyV9ucgsR9/PKrauQkYsm2D0bqBPg8Dwoz6JZCPO26R3UvJSjnAKdxOTMw/D+3bIQ25Jt25sLDS4tDQSN5ClG+j32SpDtmSoO7/ql1dng/VhBqvsbXDI4/7WMwTIkBsd2olF/GEIcxhkiJ6nWPkcWWO81nE2uU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788933486; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aJNCSNSBpKOhqt41xOzrbnRSRmiJVWJ4FO67LX2pt+M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=caW2T7XHwWsLdPo6yb5uVDTw2y52C5ahJA8NmUtzdbnaX4pimTK4CmR3oEO7mePfaO6CWWMVjeFpPaeBolkQ9djDLO5RHMDylYreYZz+vZuFSQKdXLN07Cu5elKD/0VAxaPn166wQRRcwarjfbsmo+SzUMuvgCWFa1CD8tROvig= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=y5aZhcXl; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=JJQR3dz3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="y5aZhcXl"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="JJQR3dz3" Received: from phl-compute-08.internal (phl-compute-08.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62D51D000D4; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 01:58:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-08.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Sep 2026 01:58:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1788933484; x=1789019884; bh=MNIg0KjKki EqlkC8uZ4j1ZnDcT5EDbxRGnUWBGAPT0w=; b=y5aZhcXlmHFhSk2hti4Y+uBm1a 6vfdvLX+RHZYRqOM7X6mKWP08UeUtGE40OHxnls/7N0ipURE2aeT/XUDZvxZM6Q0 QNlUap+B2rd257Q0X9vnviMxA1EuUhkQGU7v2n8txSQi6+hSS0dfjR7bfx9+7Sjr GoC5J/Pz4r/7TezIiAAgWgyb0g8bozcvMipUyfFzXEqKPSuVsZQihpclTT3Dfk6g 0e7dR/R75vWMA47Gjzyq39CoNK41IcVae1I70FJNtwxXVu2BGyfYIBOXJuH9vmCk VtGhdR+vCjUHHCEJ0X24lKa8Duqz+sqFmucl7ys4bBrLdfEmsnyk3Jlmtmyg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1788933484; x=1789019884; bh=MNIg0KjKkiEqlkC8uZ4j1ZnDcT5EDbxRGnU WBGAPT0w=; b=JJQR3dz3EoBYU0eAX3MwUx9t9gvUxX+106FILD5UEqNe2nAtaD6 LLw5++2hIyrgBPyiz4dp1+T9EyS0fsR1wxxjSbjP5OcpMYgtIRBVnaKd+qj89t7Z IdvBhe4l6PFMRJdEpcOUm1/tfSDv0zYsj5Awy7oqZryotzKFqFbkwzJ4Hy8cOWf9 9kcJhsDT+/d14I1Bv82zl+bJSXlbXRlrAb+czqtVn053gN3kIlaWIOOSt5HTzB3p hmmcTL090AWjFHZrAdHXzRnSsXjuetWze9meLGYY1KamDXaweycYDPeKbK6qHl+P uGpGppN+ALYY1JhdQ9EGveHUAw2Bd4LYXsQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTFsTjzmcP91mI+yZHqymkIiMDnXcie6o10o+bFBIZG2mxBwSL7XCpGvBvg2+i0y1M B8+JicRvagy4EMGt40FU0ZHKgsGVF4iOp73Dp6Cb0RqDHLxrCWF/q7v72e1O8LCGF7Lr7u kc1kcFiiYxqna2qLNVZmBJsMP6Fu7RXx45yaY+ifMcZvMFVC92lUtbAkRYj9rrdHlazj/g 3oqXrerCXV9De0iOL5KkhDk6BpNTgaaR93gYPySNgRCQROxwDfHMGDu3/rsZ4Qqc9N3Fz/ bRfY0Im06+ovRZZv8D4XUAAjxtLg5Dm43Vj9gP50pwh/Q/h7ExGG7+deBNvEdMGSzbhiIL neJwwaHReMevDU2e1CprdWdAswpxC4qkjKHg4/CPrL02JwuxZCyiOLLWTi4uGWFGJeDFpH BSNwNdO4jmyHEP9jX2GXymGq/3A8HzwcvRr6+toaQw0DqWH3VQcV/csKtb5cUS116WU3sB 8Z37dqO6G5dabj6GatEid/Sk1nsn2trUtAHpaqncq3ouw3Tea2Ime/bFuualL3w1NXCdeO /1URMP3VEO0hSE898VAi7e1EWMvKLhoPJ9oQPpMB4kwD1bIFXFftxXjKixBG6QEQrdawqf B5cDH1MKYPyjOqmUIMW4HkJbeP8ugJgn9DavcicVFZwdR6XZbdDhsA5365wQ X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 01:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id eaf79747 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 9 Sep 2026 05:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 07:57:58 +0200 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood , Johannes Schindelin , Phillip Wood , Thomas Bachem Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] sequencer: leave auto maintenance to the end of a sequence Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 08:53:05AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget" writes: > > > Changes since v2: > > > > * Auto maintenance now runs from builtin/rebase.c and builtin/revert.c, > > once the command is done, instead of from three places inside the > > sequencer. That follows the apply backend, where "git am" leaves it to > > rebase.c (Patrick, Phillip). > > * gc.auto=0 dropped, maintenance.auto=false is enough (Patrick). > > * config_parameters is a char * built once with strbuf_detach() (Junio). > > * Patch 3 extends the tests of patch 2 instead of adding its own. They also > > assert that nothing runs before a stop, and cover a single pick with > > --edit and a sequence ending in --skip (Phillip). > > * Commit messages rewritten: what GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS is and looks like > > (Patrick), what patch 2 changes for the user and why the call moved > > (Patrick, Phillip), and the comment on the helper (Phillip). > > > > Based on master. Independent of the rerere lock fix in [1]. > > Will queue. > > By the way, is it just me or are proposed log messages getting > longer and longer with more irrelevant detaild these days? > > If it is not just my imagination, this trend must stop. It's not your imagination, it's gotten quite a bit worse over the last couple weeks. I also started to push back on this trend, see [1] for example. Thanks! Patrick [1]: