Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] setup: split up concerns of `init_db()`

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 05:12:21PM -0500, Justin Tobler wrote:
> On 26/09/07 10:25AM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > diff --git a/setup.h b/setup.h
> > index 763fd384e8..c4aa464caa 100644
> > --- a/setup.h
> > +++ b/setup.h
> > @@ -256,23 +256,21 @@ int apply_repository_format(struct repository *repo,
> >  
> >  const char *get_template_dir(const char *option_template);
> >  
> > -#define INIT_DB_QUIET      (1 << 0)
> > -#define INIT_DB_EXIST_OK   (1 << 1)
> > -#define INIT_DB_SKIP_REFDB (1 << 2)
> > -
> > -int init_db(struct repository *repo,
> > -	    const char *git_dir,
> > -	    const char *real_git_dir,
> > -	    const char *worktree,
> > -	    const char *template_dir, int hash_algo,
> > -	    enum ref_storage_format ref_storage_format,
> > -	    const char *initial_branch, int init_shared_repository,
> > -	    unsigned int flags);
> > +void create_repository(struct repository *repo,
> > +		       const char *git_dir,
> > +		       const char *real_git_dir,
> > +		       const char *worktree,
> > +		       const char *template_dir,
> > +		       int hash_algo,
> > +		       enum ref_storage_format ref_storage_format,
> > +		       int init_shared_repository,
> > +		       int *reinit_ok);
> 
> While we are here, it might be nice to document these functions a little
> bit. The NULL/non-NULL behavior of `reinit_ok` may not be entirely
> obvious to future readers.
> 
> >  void initialize_repository_version(struct repository *repo,
> >  				   int hash_algo,
> >  				   enum ref_storage_format ref_storage_format,
> >  				   int reinit);
> >  void create_reference_database(struct repository *repo, const char *initial_branch, int quiet);
> > +void create_object_database(struct repository *repo);
> 
> It might also be nice to document these functions to explain exactly
> what we are "creating".

Yeah, fair. Will add some comments here.

Patrick