Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ci: use twice the CPU count on both providers
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 16:45:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar0gnpgH7CJqN_w2@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930-ci-large-test-resources-v3-2-d65ac7c21b5f@gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 10:20:35AM -0400, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> GitHub Actions sets JOBS to ten regardless of runner size, while
> GitLab CI uses the detected CPU count. Use twice the CPU count for
> Make and prove on both providers, doubling GitLab's job count.
> 
> Five GitHub Actions attempts per policy, with the long tests enabled,
> gave these sums of per-job median successful build/test-step times
> (minutes; four or five samples per job) [1-3]:
> 
>                       Fixed 10   CPU count   2x CPU count
>   Linux Make             278.9       273.9          259.9
>   macOS Make              94.5       119.1           99.8
>   Windows Make           102.2       103.8          100.8
> 
> Workflow overhead is excluded; Windows runner images varied.
> 
> Use twice the CPU count to scale concurrency with runner size while
> avoiding the larger macOS slowdown observed with one job per CPU.
> Compared with ten jobs, this trades a lower Linux total for a higher
> macOS total.

Right. We could of course special-case macOS. But I don't feel like it
makes sense to squeeze every single second out of a job that's already
the fastest anyway.

Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-30 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23 17:13 [PATCH 0/2] ci: reduce pressure from large test fixtures Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-23 17:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] t4205: compare huge output without diff Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-24  6:13   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-24 20:41     ` Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-25  0:13       ` Jeff King
2026-09-25  6:41         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28  6:36       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-23 17:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] ci: match Linux jobs to available CPUs Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-24  6:13   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-25 15:03     ` Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-23 18:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] ci: reduce pressure from large test fixtures Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-25 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ci: use cmp and align job-count selection Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-25 16:35   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t4205: compare huge output without diff Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-28  6:36     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-25 16:35   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ci: align job counts across CI providers Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-28  6:36     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-28 10:16       ` Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-28 11:14         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-30 14:20   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ci: use cmp and align job-count selection Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-30 14:20     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] t4205: compare huge output without diff Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-30 14:20     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ci: use twice the CPU count on both providers Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-30 14:45       ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-09-30 14:45     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ci: use cmp and align job-count selection Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-30 14:58       ` Tamir Duberstein
2026-09-30 18:04         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ar0gnpgH7CJqN_w2@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=tamird@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox