From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from complex.crustytoothpaste.net (complex.crustytoothpaste.net [172.105.7.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5934925B0B6 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2026 13:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790517351; cv=none; b=sj4RTM14KVhHhoqS8tv8WMEYqJvymoACAHckC1sgHSGbCcXNCpT/r4Hjl5f2I6dqBVuVU0+DLFiZrmE+LA648hRh4xio4v6gv/5p7YOjdrmevOrk/+MtPCxEJTPizhay5vhk/nDmt+6LrJbGqBXBIj9xUGbeW0qusiQAYd0h9rQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790517351; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PwBIF3FFJ2GhXrI6D64tS9OOwGCkQle/FAtKxE6Cf04=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=l3X+0D4avWV6+m7RmZ3pNn9o2IELSJu5qjiwZtHVe+Zl4zZDI7D5Nw3lMmh55E/haPv7Np5eUBZP8hcCpvuj92lxs/HLxwUr1L52sisn9HK7xN4hPydyQaSPBd8lN74sDGqRh+FxPk8EyqlUavgcr6FCgs+kwJdAAdvtgBYjNWc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b=aVzOWvrS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b="aVzOWvrS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1790517016; bh=PwBIF3FFJ2GhXrI6D64tS9OOwGCkQle/FAtKxE6Cf04=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=aVzOWvrSMs+NOrShtTyt7gKJHKIWgSqHpOPQ4M44DQbx90piImQ1V+smC729CL9H7 W0kXiA8e/8KxJxiq3UCAG2hzyDCBGH5TMFVEzGPuyJJv7qyx1SJ7yOzS76TdlYRfBW 26ATvyDGQStFwElhoQNQfaq10XqvRUqNabCxM2wFYf1dwafmGYfeb7dOrH2VaAYbfI rxrshWigPOXXGeE4FgC8FRb7PNCsGB2gviac4t47+Vw80Sb2+o0i0UE0ZrzNtY3LEx Vt5yCT3jmgJdyQAlxmBFeGixsTcQzNOESXahsQArjuj981LyBr23RvIY59WMLcbiW3 ATt3gJxJDWGauPpD9MzSgnIlCr9xMK9WPzcTDcYDcbeoiNJmKKpToAGmT8h5HlDYlU Ppg586smL1+VbCu9hqXbp03L1qV+mbFoxoEu6z2Xp83B6c/Z+TGI34YrFWMEv1GP4f sZLAws29HlnFkVMqN/dHeKq4HR1zoViXPB1vrfGZGiATIbSXtVc Received: from fruit.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:f2c0:f00f:f901:89b7:82e7:fe5d:3046]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by complex.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D1FC200FF; Sun, 27 Sep 2026 13:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 13:50:14 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: jyotish kumar Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [DOC] name-rev: --annotate-stdin docs still describe SHA-1 Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , jyotish kumar , git@vger.kernel.org References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MQGAx58QdhXQoUaF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.4.1 (2026-07-04) --MQGAx58QdhXQoUaF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2026-09-27 at 09:54:58, jyotish kumar wrote: > Hi, Hey, > Would it make sense to update these descriptions to refer to the > object ID length used by the selected hash algorithm, rather than > specifically referring to SHA-1? >=20 > If this is considered a documentation bug, I would be happy to prepare > a small patch. Yes, I think this is a documentation bug and a patch would be welcome. --=20 brian m. carlson (they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA --MQGAx58QdhXQoUaF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wr0EABYKAG8Fgmq5HxYJEHwMSWKIh6KBRxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25z LnNlcXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ3oR4aLF2onNdHf6EUIoIk5Om1nJ1LSNjPgO+5uvk2sZ FiEECCzmip28ZfuD0cORfAxJYoiHooEAAOspAP9uHtRpxfxIwNyodHXrhMESDFq/ VX1TeYCfnjsphaOxjwD7Bd870ESRJMxa/RkEIVRhiTrfPa4ejmhqEcodWKE7Fgk= =Gf1U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MQGAx58QdhXQoUaF--