From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Siddharth Shrimali <r.siddharth.shrimali@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, coygeek@gmail.com, ben.knoble@gmail.com,
gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] repack: do not rebuild packs on --dry-run
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:30:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as4WY96-KXQT_PTc@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010210050.76064-1-r.siddharth.shrimali@gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 11, 2026 at 02:30:50AM +0530, Siddharth Shrimali wrote:
> builtin/repack.c | 7 +++++++
> t/t7706-repack-drop-filtered.sh | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/repack.c b/builtin/repack.c
> index c4360382c1..7797972642 100644
> --- a/builtin/repack.c
> +++ b/builtin/repack.c
> @@ -387,14 +387,21 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc,
> if (dry_run) {
> struct oidset_iter iter;
> const struct object_id *oid;
>
> oidset_iter_init(&drop_oids, &iter);
> while ((oid = oidset_iter_next(&iter)))
> printf("%s\n", oid_to_hex(oid));
> +
> + /*
> + * Only list the candidates to be dropped; skip
> + * the actual repack
> + */
> + ret = 0;
> + goto cleanup;
> }
> }
Okay, makes sense. I wonder though, we later have a check like this:
if (pack_everything & ALL_INTO_ONE) {
repack_promisor_objects(repo, &po_args, &names, packtmp,
(drop_filtered && !dry_run) ? &drop_oids : NULL);
Is the `!dry_run` check redundant now because of the above early exit?
Patrick
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 6:25 [PATCH] repack: do not rebuild packs on --dry-run Siddharth Shrimali
2026-10-08 12:56 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-10-10 19:53 ` Siddharth Shrimali
2026-10-08 14:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-10 20:05 ` Siddharth Shrimali
2026-10-10 21:00 ` [PATCH v2] " Siddharth Shrimali
2026-10-10 21:06 ` Ben Knoble
2026-10-11 5:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-13 11:30 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=as4WY96-KXQT_PTc@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=coygeek@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=r.siddharth.shrimali@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox