Re: [BUG] branch copy/rename update refs without running the reference-transaction hook

["brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2126 bytes --]

On 2026-10-02 at 04:12:55, Никита Поникаров wrote:
> Hi,

Hi,

> githooks(5) says the reference-transaction hook "is invoked by any Git
> command that performs reference updates". Some branch copy and rename
> operations update a ref without invoking it.
> 
> Observed on git version 2.55.0.windows.5, with the hook registered both
> in .git/hooks and as a config-defined hook (hook.<name>.event).
> 
> 1. `git branch -C <src> <dst>` where <dst> exists and is not checked out
>    anywhere: <dst> is overwritten with <src>'s value and the hook is not
>    invoked in any phase. This happens on both the files and the reftable
>    backend. With every documented hook event registered to a logging
>    script, none of them fired, and a GIT_TRACE2_EVENT log showed no child
>    process.
> 
> 2. `git branch -c <src> <dst>` where <dst> does not exist: <dst> is
>    created and the hook sees no line for it.
> 
> 3. `git branch -m/-M <src> <dst>`:
>    - files backend: the hook sees the deletion of <src> and a
>      "0000... 0000... refs/heads/<dst>" line, but no line carrying
>      <dst>'s new value;
>    - reftable backend: no line names <dst> at all, and renaming a branch
>      away deletes it without a line for it.
> 
> 4. `git reflog delete --updateref --rewrite <branch>@{0}` rewinds the
>    branch without invoking the hook, on both backends.

I think there was a recent thread about this at
https://lore.kernel.org/git/CACQ=SRHCOCcmVCgHqd+sjMsZ9LCdSHuXdCo0gkwxXwYgF7iwig@mail.gmail.com/

There were some patches, but they appeared AI generated and were not
picked up.  Perhaps you or someone else could send in some
higher-quality patches not using AI (see
Documentation/SubmittingPatches) that could fix the issue.

I will say that using reference transactions to solve this problem would
be very desirable from a variety of perspectives, especially since it
would probably go a long way to unlocking way better performance for
`git remote rename` with many remote-tracking branches as well.
-- 
brian m. carlson (they/them)
Toronto, Ontario, CA

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 325 bytes --]