From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from complex.crustytoothpaste.net (complex.crustytoothpaste.net [172.105.7.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2DC175A79 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792244731; cv=none; b=D7vO2cscdKoYvXg8DhxG/GN980WHE/NhIpd93w0ufSk2R6weaDdt6QKkjWldmrzZ2VaeRVdZtmPIIafKKjzin0+rpRTULviNIeNFShdaA+9qCkEDKIG+8LH0BDRpH4VfkOMsCky9peJ/S0bmmUqseQklHFKXoe9K9wCyJYI3AUE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792244731; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Zaf4qwuRidiFwpdrrIjXh8n9Hz6IVdWSB/73ATsyirg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=b2SRK8rDhb8lPI4MRecKcbnU0qmQSYgLEA8oShqPLbyFUa5dvIfcbb45JAW05DPP3Sd1BAfqiMFWvt69N7WcIWLlAX4s05LTyJQNLE+6WErdrTFCI3Ud3G58XDUyIdr8WAfCC0ZTBW33lqoSkfu5GI+iurNqWIZZTEwqlMXSQew= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b=yNhpbYNH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b="yNhpbYNH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1792244186; bh=Zaf4qwuRidiFwpdrrIjXh8n9Hz6IVdWSB/73ATsyirg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=yNhpbYNHI917FfBD+jVGHjYmF2Tzzp8kKPluN73KQQy+rsu/b2JHcc/m9b7NTsPi2 Ib+t2byJBaPbATvhHDs2SM3oPIGbUq7fVf93T0xCI3Ab08BsdStirXbS4zYdaOKbO4 t2i/9bPMQA5N3IIlyCDktT27oRWRgunheyTSF/n/e7r7mWNkMRCorDX5l8vpv/9jRd CT7eeaXIcE0lCN+WpVR38VLDYIwx9EVloF6We2Akj+Q6V6mcVvbBbRvxsCAdR9/pql //U1QhFWWXY4ee3xDRM5rhHFMudma0hD25N4qsX/s0jor7z1uzXwGtxEmeetZsdVGx zuTo4bv6cDI5VMhqC/sDip7H6/2Xlfe4nmNCt8kNLQIRunhbp8niwXxgsp+Xs9llGS nFmkW8XfDF5nB51KnLzRbvw+1zncWUzmNpBOY6ZzBliNj3Vs/ZAO/BqT1rsga0/+pQ qjXRW2Eac+Q/cmn/+vhpL8L48HnmXyeTN+OhRHXbB9J96snwy1e Received: from fruit.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:f2c0:f00f:f901:cd:73f5:f355:ccfe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by complex.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A225200C9; Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:36:25 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] github-ci: update macos jobs to macos-15 Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vuxzExMS7RqFqOzF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.4.1 (2026-07-04) --vuxzExMS7RqFqOzF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2026-10-16 at 22:46:36, Junio C Hamano wrote: > GitHub from address keeps sending >=20 > Subject: [Action Required] macOS 14 hosted runner image is closing down >=20 > and suggests to update to either macos-latest (macos-26) or > macos-15. As we do not have strong reason to pick one over the > other, this patch picks more conservative choice with hopefully > smaller impact. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano > --- > * Not tested at all and I do not do macos myself. I think this is fine if it passes CI. There's not that much of a difference in terms of POSIX-related functionality in different versions of macOS, so upgrading to macOS 15 shouldn't be a problem. I think 15 is a better option than 26 because we're more likely to avoid anything new that older versions don't have. --=20 brian m. carlson (they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA --vuxzExMS7RqFqOzF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wr0EABYKAG8FgmrTedgJEHwMSWKIh6KBRxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25z LnNlcXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ+Ub4kOGxiEkTReNCVexC+w8xNEwOcrZW5KN0EqS1Glo FiEECCzmip28ZfuD0cORfAxJYoiHooEAAA5cAQD7UjlLfSHCjBgCguzVlO6qWotM wHXgaF6WwKG1JpJkBgEAzdvvkYLSrP6EZD7wldLOAwh0ZbkkzNqRMyBxIxhe3QM= =7KQ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vuxzExMS7RqFqOzF--