From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Shashank S via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>,
Usman Akinyemi <usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Shashank S <shashu8660@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [Outreachy Patch] prune-packed: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 09:02:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atsGfWzCMW0LMHNX@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2266.v2.git.1792428811100.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 04:53:31PM +0000, Shashank S via GitGitGadget wrote:
> Range-diff vs v1:
>
> 1: 5d9ba0cf3a ! 1: 6b583e1d46 prune-packed: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
> @@
> ## Metadata ##
> -Author: Shashank <shashu8660@gmail.com>
> +Author: Shashank S Mogaveera <shashu8660@gmail.com>
>
> ## Commit message ##
> - prune-packed: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
> + [Outreachy Patch] prune-packed: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
This prefix shouldn't be part of the patch subject itself.
> - Right now, the prune_packed_objects() function uses the global
> + The prune_packed_objects() function uses the global
> the_repository variable. To help with the libification effort,
> change this function so it takes a 'struct repository' pointer
> as an argument instead.
> @@ Commit message
> prune_object() callbacks to read from this new struct.
>
> Update the builtins that call this function (builtin/prune-packed.c,
> - builtin/prune.c, and builtin/repack.c) to pass their local `repo`
One small nit: I don't think we need to have the list here.
> - variables. Because we are now actually using the 'repo' parameter
> - in these files, we can safely remove the UNUSED macro from them.
> + builtin/prune.c, and builtin/repack.c) to pass their local 'repo'
> + variables. We can safely remove the UNUSED macro from them because
> + these commands are all declared with the RUN_SETUP flag in git.c,
> + which guarantees that the 'repo' pointer will never be NULL.
As mentioned by Junio, this isn't true. The repo pointer _may_ be NULL
in the case where "-h" is passed.
Thanks!
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-18 16:31 [PATCH] prune-packed: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE Shashank S via GitGitGadget
2026-10-19 7:09 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-19 16:38 ` Shashank S
2026-10-19 21:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-20 16:27 ` Shashank S
2026-10-19 16:53 ` [PATCH v2] [Outreachy Patch] " Shashank S via GitGitGadget
2026-10-23 7:02 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-10-24 4:16 ` Shashank S
2026-10-24 9:22 ` [PATCH v3] " Shashank S via GitGitGadget
2026-10-26 8:38 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atsGfWzCMW0LMHNX@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com \
--cc=shashu8660@gmail.com \
--cc=siddharthasthana31@gmail.com \
--cc=usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox