Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Shashank S via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
	Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>,
	Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>,
	Usman Akinyemi <usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Shashank S <shashu8660@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [Outreachy Patch] prune-packed: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 09:02:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atsGfWzCMW0LMHNX@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2266.v2.git.1792428811100.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 04:53:31PM +0000, Shashank S via GitGitGadget wrote:
> Range-diff vs v1:
> 
>  1:  5d9ba0cf3a ! 1:  6b583e1d46 prune-packed: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
>      @@
>        ## Metadata ##
>      -Author: Shashank <shashu8660@gmail.com>
>      +Author: Shashank S Mogaveera <shashu8660@gmail.com>
>       
>        ## Commit message ##
>      -    prune-packed: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
>      +    [Outreachy Patch] prune-packed: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE

This prefix shouldn't be part of the patch subject itself.

>      -    Right now, the prune_packed_objects() function uses the global
>      +    The prune_packed_objects() function uses the global
>           the_repository variable. To help with the libification effort,
>           change this function so it takes a 'struct repository' pointer
>           as an argument instead.
>      @@ Commit message
>           prune_object() callbacks to read from this new struct.
>       
>           Update the builtins that call this function (builtin/prune-packed.c,
>      -    builtin/prune.c, and builtin/repack.c) to pass their local `repo`

One small nit: I don't think we need to have the list here.

>      -    variables. Because we are now actually using the 'repo'  parameter
>      -    in these files, we can safely remove the UNUSED macro from them.
>      +    builtin/prune.c, and builtin/repack.c) to pass their local 'repo'
>      +    variables. We can safely remove the UNUSED macro from them because
>      +    these commands are all declared with the RUN_SETUP flag in git.c,
>      +    which guarantees that the 'repo' pointer will never be NULL.

As mentioned by Junio, this isn't true. The repo pointer _may_ be NULL
in the case where "-h" is passed.

Thanks!

Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-23  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-18 16:31 [PATCH] prune-packed: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE Shashank S via GitGitGadget
2026-10-19  7:09 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-19 16:38   ` Shashank S
2026-10-19 21:05     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-20 16:27       ` Shashank S
2026-10-19 16:53 ` [PATCH v2] [Outreachy Patch] " Shashank S via GitGitGadget
2026-10-23  7:02   ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-10-24  4:16     ` Shashank S
2026-10-24  9:22 ` [PATCH v3] " Shashank S via GitGitGadget
2026-10-26  8:38   ` Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atsGfWzCMW0LMHNX@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com \
    --cc=shashu8660@gmail.com \
    --cc=siddharthasthana31@gmail.com \
    --cc=usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox