From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.131 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792846995; b=Kgp1rTo5oEy5EKw1z1jIk5zh/RyyJWZ7eQu8ZOHULNKOXN9FcB2tnzH6Res0Njr694Al audw17Ku1Tv1QDQc7MSciS1fd6voGWSWtGxggfhe3JMXDwEoBdycFNHzrMJcQNJtNb0AZ UItKyJH4uafEZO0CFCTjI7ckKjUUNNMJYJxsxChbcxenGpFvSU8ZlZw9VmVqlPM6QLKl4 YGosOn0TME+O/3KLDccrFCCQmdE+7IFUov1sLNE3bXxsdDyb9d6pG/Xyvc2ab9ilKIv6/ 6oxuNyUIxBSR4FdtnrPM7FUJYgdcgBUHzbPcXh1M65hXAlCANpJZwOsh0voW2DGEcTQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792846995; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=rEhtx469y6DPo5cODQxVAsE9Klh5yJQOoz4V4i4YsnE=; b=us1bzFsAcqnXZx3eRx/T1hcBghOzEZzxsKfhgpeZkWmwnvZ8miGssUe6dIAz1JqoN/OX 5ZHXoHq8fpaia09hIAMmVOGAhdVBqQI5jK8K3yFdcUFyoMPV88h3Tua7V/QWzYo0P5+bL 8FxTPqAh5IqD/haaRVwhkOnuY6f7JWIBxrtygLiHWlxWMQGvpcCTGKYVPH/8jcE4KrT8m e6Iav8Rd7pkyvjmziRbp04QWuVhGlhUkfM76pAgT2njy166wVLQAp+1hT0ZcwQHhC9B69 gmtYoYPIF5XcJbYDkgzDruNEsam3EN05bcfeWvcbSINcVVroE3PmF6BPaVpu3zAixKA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=wyuan.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org; dkim=pass header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=PW2LfbeG; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.131 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-131.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D686F606A31A for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 13:03:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org D686F606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wyuan.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=wyuan.org header.i=@wyuan.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=PW2LfbeG X-Envelope-To: git@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=O/wNmZB+5n7dA8jcUvKUlK/5+j3HzfBpqNJY5JqLlzs=; c=simple/simple; d=wyuan.org; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1792846991; v=1; x=1793451791; b=PW2LfbeGjEjdLnrAM7rfdRwOPcxvdc06Kcud/r23QyILLouQpqLjmZaOEuS46toEiQBoVN2S 6Bk2RU4R1bzFX7pYHVxvInr1nKyiVgkhfJbn3GZCCWIFBfxLwJvzzlCAV8d9iH0dUHXTHK2UHuR UT5vAe5m6SkdDXswP+fTI9na9iH2HeB2UeQAtJESIrdMb1ct4+0AGuiOyrKWX0Bp3JKTW8aN9WT YAMtaNqL4b+hTZGlGeWhv2tn/4RVCnDWd9N7qs7o0jcft2FY23GAqlc5cl+QsDX/1sR9OfEZY5B HgprGw3vVaStJl8F4t7RAT6OotGnuA2MIy+njsYxeSx+g== X-Envelope-To: git@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id d4f2fbd0bfbf50e6; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 13:03:11 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: d4f2fbd0bfbf50e6 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 21:03:07 +0800 From: Weijie Yuan To: Tuomas Ahola Cc: Junio C Hamano , Phillip Wood , Emily Shaffer , git@vger.kernel.org, Justin Tobler , Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: propose community voting process Message-ID: References: <20261021200341.378978-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20261024111856.8s8qu%taahol@utu.fi> X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261024111856.8s8qu%taahol@utu.fi> Tuomas Ahola writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > [...] > > I previously mentioned "topic count", but commits are far easier to > > count. So instead of requiring two topics in released versions, > > perhaps requiring five commits would be easier to implement and > > explain. > > > > Quoting the summit notes: > > } * Emily: Have we used a voting process for something like this before? > } > } * Patrick: We need proposals and a vote. Who would be allowed to vote? > } > } * Peff: Active developers with a track record; perhaps a threshold such > } as 50 merged patches. > } > > So it seems that Peff's proposed threshold was substantially higher > than what has been put forth in this thread. Any comments on that? Although I could selfishly say that I'd like to have a vote, since I might just meet the threshold in Junio's example, I'm rather afraid that I'm not qualified enough and don't have the kind of foresight like Junio and Peff have to justify having an equal say in Git's direction. Thanks.