From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stgit - gitmergeonefile.py: handle removal vs. changes Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:32:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20051113194225.20447.57910.stgit@zion.home.lan> <200511161544.13825.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <437D0949.3060505@citi.umich.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Blaisorblade , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 21 22:34:07 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EeJHJ-0006Yq-2M for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:32:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750881AbVKUVcm (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:32:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750887AbVKUVcm (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:32:42 -0500 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.197]:313 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750855AbVKUVcl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:32:41 -0500 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so734066wxd for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:32:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FpHSpEyr76YosbpS6JjjEp/iIXlGXtfZD1MOxPlz2Y9H6R8vqknynK+g79S39FV8fe/y+xDQfsq2g8qt9CtjUEh8z/+znjznq4j0dOmfiNl2Al/RcS9t2mL3ewv0qNyAgAHyVEUtSQ05hTopLSEUz0ulT05Us+/DOOFnRc/FfB0= Received: by 10.70.63.14 with SMTP id l14mr2673663wxa; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:32:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.27.12 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:32:40 -0800 (PST) To: cel@citi.umich.edu In-Reply-To: <437D0949.3060505@citi.umich.edu> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 17/11/05, Chuck Lever wrote: > i use "original" "patch" and "older" (set up in .stgitrc) because i > found the default labels to be confusing. > > but "original" "patch" and "upstream" make sense to me. These names would need to have a meaning for the result of the 'fold --threeway' and 'pick' commands. 'patch' and 'original' are ok but 'upstream' might not make sense since for these commands it can represent the top of an existing patch. -- Catalin