From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Catalin Marinas" Subject: git-rev-list bug? Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 16:19:48 +0000 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 08 17:20:35 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FH1OC-00033o-VB for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:19:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932065AbWCHQTu (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 11:19:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932098AbWCHQTt (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 11:19:49 -0500 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.206]:31589 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932065AbWCHQTt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 11:19:49 -0500 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h31so156297wxd for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:19:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=P9bTf236mH6UET+zQb0rAIx+Iz7a5VYT4JEwG+Tu7L0T5yUIYDDRpQfMn1xY29WXKY7iqOcoq+abhkUmxWOxuDInSZvAwM8uHzsvFO80ubQNBsOHKIPD3xxJfmsks5CrPLz29riiRAp2KqJz6lmy4T8/I/jp+FJMive6qd65cUw= Received: by 10.70.124.1 with SMTP id w1mr1018647wxc; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:19:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.31.4 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:19:48 -0800 (PST) To: git Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sorry if this was previously discussed. I ran git-rev-list on a linear graph and tried to filter the results by a file name: git rev-list since.. path/to/file but it always shows the child commit of "since" even if it didn't touch the file. The same behaviour is for git-log (since it uses git-rev-list) but git-whatchanged seems to be fine. Is this the intended behaviour? The "stg patches" command based on git-rev-list used to work fine a few weeks ago but now it is always reporting the bottom patch in the stack as modifying a given file. Thanks. -- Catalin