From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Catalin Marinas" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Rebase to parent branch after git-fetch in "stg pull". Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:58:06 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20070201234534.3313.10426.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> <20070201234805.3313.20525.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Yann Dirson" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 02 10:58:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HCvBN-0000a9-9L for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:58:13 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932967AbXBBJ6J (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2007 04:58:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932998AbXBBJ6J (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2007 04:58:09 -0500 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.227]:37303 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932967AbXBBJ6I (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2007 04:58:08 -0500 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i22so684629wra for ; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 01:58:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M2vRw/IsmWa5hD96C8DcfNNI8gICIIucpLzjseci5FFbwmvd3DDLtrMaECqm+C1v9JJKBMwbzyemxIdHvXkfSDseuipwOAv9pOIQtu26oY5n0C9Be54en2nnjLgpmowyHQ2jxwKE/EhquEu7maOPPo33X4Gd2g5+NCyeYMbFhbg= Received: by 10.114.12.9 with SMTP id 9mr277644wal.1170410287008; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 01:58:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.110.12 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 01:58:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20070201234805.3313.20525.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 01/02/07, Yann Dirson wrote: > Previously we were just assuming that the remote from which we > just failed defined a local branch whose name was the same as the > remote def, and that this branch was the parent. While this is true > for the most common case (branch "origin" from remote "origin"), it is > quite an unflexible assumption. The t1200-push-modified.sh test fails after applying this patch. It looks like the 3rd test fails to pull the changes from 'foo' into 'bar'. Thanks. -- Catalin