From: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
To: "Karl Hasselström" <kha@treskal.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [StGIT PATCH] Don't use patches/<branch>/current
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:51:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0943d9e0705171351j1a86a4f4ge0283c522a351645@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070517145724.GA905@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
On 17/05/07, Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> wrote:
> The only possibility I can think of that might explain this is that
> some of your unapplied patches are attached to a place in the commit
> DAG that's far away from the branch head (e.g. you have rebased to
> some entirely different place since you last had them applied), so
> that "git-rev-list patch ^branch" outputs a large part of the commit
> DAG.
That's probably the case. I have patches that I haven't rebased for
months but I keep them in case they might be needed in the future.
That's the reason for the hide/unhide commands. Anyway, I'm not yet
prepared to give up my current workflow.
I haven't tried to understand your patch yet but the unapplied patches
will never be in a linear DAG similar to the applied patches. Because
of this, we need to keep their order in a file anyway and we might not
need to run git-rev-list (BTW, how do you preserve the unapplied
patches order with the DAG implementation?).
> Could you put counters in unapplied_patches() and
> sort_applied_patches() to see how many lines each of them reads from
> git-rev-list? The expected number (if it had taken just a little time,
> like it did for me) is a small constant times the number of patches in
> both cases.
I'll do this tomorrow to confirm but that's probably the cause of the slow-down.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-17 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-06 15:13 [StGIT PATCH] Don't use patches/<branch>/current Karl Hasselström
2007-05-15 15:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-05-15 16:21 ` Peter Oberndorfer
2007-05-15 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-05-15 18:25 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-15 19:38 ` [StGIT PATCH] Remove obsolete files when deleting a branch Karl Hasselström
2007-05-15 20:01 ` [StGIT PATCH] Don't use patches/<branch>/current Catalin Marinas
2007-05-16 7:11 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-16 12:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-05-16 19:40 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-16 20:40 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-17 12:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-05-17 14:57 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-17 20:51 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2007-05-18 6:30 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-06-10 9:54 ` [StGIT PATCH 0/6] New and improved DAG appliedness series Karl Hasselström
2007-06-10 9:54 ` [StGIT PATCH 1/6] Verify patch status during the test Karl Hasselström
2007-06-10 9:55 ` [StGIT PATCH 2/6] Make use of the get_patch() utility function Karl Hasselström
2007-06-10 9:55 ` [StGIT PATCH 3/6] Compute patch appliedness from commit DAG Karl Hasselström
2007-06-10 9:55 ` [StGIT PATCH 4/6] Test the new DAG appliedness machinery Karl Hasselström
2007-06-10 9:55 ` [StGIT PATCH 5/6] Fix bash completion after the DAG appliedness patch Karl Hasselström
2007-06-10 9:55 ` [StGIT PATCH 6/6] Speed up the appliedness test Karl Hasselström
2007-06-30 19:54 ` [StGIT PATCH 0/6] New and improved DAG appliedness series Yann Dirson
2007-07-01 14:35 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-15 21:08 ` [StGIT PATCH] Don't use patches/<branch>/current Yann Dirson
2007-05-15 21:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-05-15 21:49 ` Yann Dirson
2007-05-16 6:27 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-19 0:09 ` [StGIT PATCH 0/5] Metadata format versioning Karl Hasselström
2007-05-19 0:09 ` [StGIT PATCH 1/5] Fix config caching so that get, set, get works Karl Hasselström
2007-05-19 0:09 ` [StGIT PATCH 2/5] Have only a single command in each test_expect_failure Karl Hasselström
2007-05-19 0:10 ` [StGIT PATCH 3/5] Upgrade old StGIT branches to new-format metadata Karl Hasselström
2007-05-19 0:10 ` [StGIT PATCH 4/5] Test the format version upgrade code Karl Hasselström
2007-05-19 0:10 ` [StGIT PATCH 5/5] Add --binary flag to commands that generate diffs Karl Hasselström
2007-05-22 12:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-05-22 13:31 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-20 20:03 ` [StGit PATCH 0/2] Bash prompt updates Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-20 20:04 ` [StGit PATCH 1/2] Update the bash prompt from 'applied' instead of the obsolete 'current' Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-20 20:46 ` Yann Dirson
2007-05-20 21:22 ` [PATCH " Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-21 7:48 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-21 9:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-05-21 10:15 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-21 11:39 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-21 15:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-05-21 15:39 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-22 12:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-05-22 13:29 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-05-21 18:57 ` Yann Dirson
2007-05-20 21:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] Don't use / as separatar since it is common i branch names Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-20 20:04 ` [StGit PATCH " Robin Rosenberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0943d9e0705171351j1a86a4f4ge0283c522a351645@mail.gmail.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kha@treskal.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).