From: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
To: "Pavel Roskin" <proski@gnu.org>
Cc: "Karl Hasselström" <kha@treskal.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Yann Dirson" <ydirson@altern.org>
Subject: Re: 'pu' branch for StGIT
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:31:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0943d9e0708091431k57ac095asa940cca73ad95b13@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1186665883.28228.31.camel@dv>
On 09/08/2007, Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:38 +0200, Karl Hasselström wrote:
>
> > I take it this all means you're actually using my branch? What's your
> > opinion on its usefulness?
>
> Well, I tried it, and then ran a script to update all local
> repositories. It converted everything to "version 3", so I'm sort of
> stuck with it. If the "version 3" code is not committed to the mainline
> StGIT, I'll have to convert my repositories back or even re-fetch them.
I'll merge many of Karl's patches for the next stable release (which I
hope to be sooner than the current 0.13) but I'm still on holiday for
one more week and can't do much work (busy with DIY).
Thanks to Karl for setting up this experimental branch. BTW, what does
'pu' mean?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-09 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-07 2:20 'pu' branch for StGIT Karl Hasselström
2007-08-07 2:38 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-08-08 5:03 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-08-08 9:20 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-08 21:39 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-08 22:18 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-08-08 23:23 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-09 0:10 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-08-09 7:38 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-09 13:24 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-08-09 14:18 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-09 14:24 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-09 16:33 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-08-09 20:39 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-10 3:23 ` [StGIT PATCH 0/2] Teach StGIT to survive git-gc Karl Hasselström
2007-08-10 3:23 ` [StGIT PATCH 1/2] New test: make sure that StGIT can handle packed refs Karl Hasselström
2007-08-10 3:23 ` [StGIT PATCH 2/2] Don't touch ref files manually Karl Hasselström
2007-08-21 13:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-08-21 15:58 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-21 16:09 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-21 16:12 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-08-21 16:38 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-21 16:46 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-21 20:48 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-08-23 14:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2007-08-09 21:31 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2007-08-10 0:30 ` 'pu' branch for StGIT Karl Hasselström
2007-08-12 22:47 ` Pavel Roskin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0943d9e0708091431k57ac095asa940cca73ad95b13@mail.gmail.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kha@treskal.com \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=ydirson@altern.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).