From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Catalin Marinas" Subject: Re: Status of kha/experimental Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 22:10:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20071007213307.GA32210@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Yann Dirson" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_K=E5gedal?=" , "Git Mailing List" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Karl_Hasselstr=F6m?=" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 09 23:11:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IfMM0-0004k2-T0 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:11:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752479AbXJIVKU convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:10:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752243AbXJIVKT (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:10:19 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.186]:56901 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751671AbXJIVKR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:10:17 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so1175616rvb for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:10:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=QWQvydpLR7GWgXXqa9O0DufwSdEMCc4pWug0SNlDDxk=; b=hIx3NjMtV9cE2sVkxqVSj6q6vwFr9xWcoeIHThBnCmAOQ8PwNX/vvdK9PORTEdHdRNIjjH3djnSXiEfaQwR9Q0CetxX1mIm/9zOkmW2Y7UjLR84TwrpiAL3aPlKywrXhOynwrRihKwNOJh82vKUIoBKsnsKYn2zifZ7isEIBSNM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TWmE7iN6DA4KQ4jUNBWAstk94ih8vfmkhT5ST9EATYng2MiPuwHU+zQ21vyDTUFJxsOThJUHxZsjlHhWp5RwNCJJL8XOPLDqR1u48CPkIKx6CY7mTcmXtTwFoZAK2JgrVoHN7XsOK3h7ff7puK/bnV/rrp9o8fz2VbaOyAgBK4I= Received: by 10.141.34.12 with SMTP id m12mr1909678rvj.1191964217147; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.187.15 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:10:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20071007213307.GA32210@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 07/10/2007, Karl Hasselstr=F6m wrote: > On 2007-10-07 22:18:44 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > How stable is the kha/experimental branch? Since there are more and > > more bugs added to the tracking system, I'll have to start looking > > at them before a 0.14 release. Is it worth merging the > > kha/experimental now or we better wait for after 0.14? > > The idea is that experimental contains changes that need testing, but > may not yet be ready for your master. (They are generally safe, > though; I run StGit from my experimental branch at work, for example.= ) > When I decide that they are ready, I move them to safe. If there are > any patches you feel should be in safe rather than experimental, just > ask. Or you could just take them directly from experimental without > asking, of course. :-) OK. My plan is to merge kha/safe and have a look at what seems safer to merge from kha/experimental. Fix bugs (and freeze the current features). Release 0.14. Merge kha/experimental entirely post 0.14 and test/stabilize it over couple of months. How does this sound? --=20 Catalin