From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Catalin Marinas" Subject: Re: [StGit PATCH 0/6] Two bugfixes Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:27:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20080320002604.13102.53757.stgit@yoghurt> <20080324181225.GC23337@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20080325110559.GA10333@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Erik Sandberg" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Karl_Hasselstr=F6m?=" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 25 16:29:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JeB3y-0002I0-QF for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:27:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755388AbYCYP1G convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:27:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755227AbYCYP1G (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:27:06 -0400 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.189]:43777 "EHLO rn-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755350AbYCYP1F convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:27:05 -0400 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id v46so1874707rnb.15 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:27:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=FiK+cO33Euc92RemvBKG+/8LeyVHoKaqyjeWwTA/EHQ=; b=ST5bYdT6lhyf3QU5B2YGXDLv4CI3PP9uLWq5DqhFe1S4jAjGUkCB3M3ylGbFRTaYpM7SMRpkno9SM6JMmk/tuddc1SodbnKN9ciKKtyYfjHhFXLnMKZwNjw8p3xSGxCtqouX6gxLQQE7fQlJNAs7K/8h8UJ+7odKvHpwVLgLYn4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gfZZcDgqkAxxPzXc3Z68hNYP8ZeI4/fYO2fch4VwVIjLCkZCmQBWFKDtK392rAEBCNKLPOot+dls76b8rLRdDqM+ZmLRDX2mjCEjIpLNJQNKmrADZQvc6HfIfjckD8MFG2QuBJO5cGoMCzRx33vsz9nfH0LcIY5vAt2HUq9Cwik= Received: by 10.140.174.18 with SMTP id w18mr3408727rve.227.1206458823798; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:27:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.175.11 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:27:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080325110559.GA10333@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 25/03/2008, Karl Hasselstr=F6m wrote: > On 2008-03-25 10:46:00 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > I personally prefer the current "refresh" way but maybe because I'= m > > used to it. It would be useful to get other users' opinion on this > > UI change. Might not be a bad change since git does this already, > > quilt needs an explicit "add" (anyone knows about guilt?). > > > I think my preference would be to to what git does: let just "stg > refresh" commit what's in the index, and have "stg refresh -a" or > something to automatically update the index first. (This should be > easy to do, btw -- refresh already has an --index flag.) > > In general, I think it's a bad idea to do things differently from gi= t > without a good reason. We can give this a try on the master branch and see how it goes. --=20 Catalin