git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
To: "Karl Hasselström" <kha@treskal.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [StGit PATCH 0/2] push optimizations
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:12:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0943d9e0807071412j71780300p87d00cccea6cd8f4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080702060113.11361.39006.stgit@yoghurt>

2008/7/2 Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>:
> Here's the git-apply call you asked for. You were right: it was a huge
> speed-up.

I know, I've been through this couple of years ago :-)

> I set up a benchmark to test it:
>
>  * 32 directories, each containing 32 subdirectories, each containing
>    32 small (and different) files.

Can you try with a Linux kernel like the -mm tree? You get normally
sized patches which might show a difference with the patch log. You
can clone the for-akpm branch on git://linux-arm.org/linux-2.6 and
just uncommit ~300 patches.

>  * I set all this up with a python script feeding fast-import. A huge
>    time-saver!

What is fast-import?

>
>  * Pop patches, git-reset to upstream, then goto top patch. This
>    makes sure that we use the new infrastructure to push, and that we
>    get one file-level conflict in each patch.
>
> Before the first patch, the "goto" command took 4:27 minutes,
> wall-clock time. After the first patch, it took 1:31. After the
> second, 0:48; one second or so slower than the stable branch (which
> does not have a patch stack log).

One second is just noise and depends on how warm the caches are. You
could run a few times consecutively and discard the first result but
we don't need to be that accurate.

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-07 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-02  6:12 [StGit PATCH 0/2] push optimizations Karl Hasselström
2008-07-02  6:12 ` [StGit PATCH 1/2] Do simple in-index merge with diff+apply instead of read-tree Karl Hasselström
2008-07-12 10:22   ` Catalin Marinas
2008-07-02  6:13 ` [StGit PATCH 2/2] Reuse the same temp index in a transaction Karl Hasselström
2008-07-03 21:38   ` [StGit PATCH v2] " Karl Hasselström
2008-07-12 10:24   ` [StGit PATCH 2/2] " Catalin Marinas
2008-07-14  6:35     ` Karl Hasselström
2008-07-07 21:12 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2008-07-08  4:36   ` [StGit PATCH 0/2] push optimizations Karl Hasselström

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0943d9e0807071412j71780300p87d00cccea6cd8f4@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kha@treskal.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).