From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Catalin Marinas" Subject: Re: StGit question Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:15:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <48C94F86.6080707@gmail.com> <20080912075116.GA26685@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <48CA6367.9020300@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Karl_Hasselstr=F6m?=" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Clark Williams" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 13 00:16:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KeGwT-0004Vn-Fg for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:16:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757791AbYILWPb (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:15:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757690AbYILWPb (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:15:31 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.238]:58194 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757575AbYILWPa (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:15:30 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so992369rvb.1 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:15:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=pG//y3uFrfpcvfAbuqRTPFopCOW6rIplqwoqFSO56sY=; b=Z6I1YjHRgva3C18jCdBlGk+GrXfByriOJoGUmUE+hgWl/7g8b2VovE+UILZSJOtiWb kXZsGb0inMk1rQRYZsCgT8i5Iu9JkA/NrUXceJUPFkY9ik7Qm32ENubrJng+pQ0ymuax heBZRfiqP7ycn0aaoQL3z+VavqDZqND5P0G7s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=luElIEP6B/ASuq6+oc1w0GE+T3NXRQydiqt1VWJk9twbD3fF32f6RYYcgoS2NAa9xj o08d7oNX463XPIGVyk7gwhqG0iTRr4cq20MPI6uV3Hf6VswfaXHKDT1BR0c7kR495ZB+ 2cFyn6kInvwmfogk31q7TJUW/t3fTIm5zXKe4= Received: by 10.141.89.13 with SMTP id r13mr2943180rvl.88.1221257729310; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.136.21 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:15:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48CA6367.9020300@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 12/09/2008, Clark Williams wrote: > Most of the time it's not more than one or two patches difference, so I think that it > can be handled manually for now. I'll definitely keep an eye on sync and merge though... As Karl said, we have some plans to allow collaboration between multiple StGit repositories but we didn't have much time to look at it recently. Karl's "merge" stuff looks promising though. What "sync" does is that it allow the same set of patches between two branches to be synchronised in case modifications happened on one of these branches. In your situation, you would have to fetch the remote branch, uncommit as in Karl's method and either import or sync the remote patches with those on your local branch. -- Catalin