From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Catalin Marinas" Subject: Re: [StGit PATCH] Convert "sink" to the new infrastructure Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:24:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20080914085118.GC30664@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20080915075740.GB14452@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20080916074024.GA2454@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20080916193647.GA12513@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20080917130432.GA26365@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20080918071020.GA12550@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Karl_Hasselstr=F6m?=" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 18 13:26:22 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KgHeP-0006ab-Bw for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:26:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753107AbYIRLYn convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:24:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754820AbYIRLYn (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:24:43 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.228]:45106 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754313AbYIRLYm convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:24:42 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so3670923rvb.1 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:24:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=s4t+RjQJnxftrV33bRNLSSDYD72Oeo/iCJu9cxdjpWU=; b=E/tjK2BeNIZ4ZEpTvy+Pabo/xAZY5sk1SgMljv9QtuQ8BwkcrjW/NkLslELNGmRqxc QCc7wGlwtpIddQ/Vpnhrs0+UZacJutnEZLkpS0VPOi4YedrXH5urCLsNbo2ys4Eyk1K/ pRJ/FKmPnfKq0AfJz6KYEgYlnmRMvX0rYIj3Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=N6fgtyY0Eu63fAzZyrUn/tOLyqYgv6TRnNdg3CUgXYySYTkEKZrOLRa1ZubpcGItkB nXwd9mrpx/3ZseggP5RsgyK8U1PthaALsORSxSmV9NzgWRS1teKlm7aDPYSg3OtOSF5y BCzSizvyx19+oLcUO40JrOPcPI+JbasdLOwE4= Received: by 10.140.164.1 with SMTP id m1mr7350830rve.69.1221737081924; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.199.1 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:24:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080918071020.GA12550@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: 2008/9/18 Karl Hasselstr=F6m : > On 2008-09-17 17:01:22 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >> 2008/9/17 Karl Hasselstr=F6m : >> >> > Have you tried the benchmarks I committed a while back? >> >> No, I wanted to see how some real patches behave and I'm pretty >> pleased with the result. > > In addition to the synthetic patch series you seem to have in mind, > there is also a more than 1000 patches long series from the kernel > history. Try running the setup.sh and take a look (it takes a few > minutes to run, but you'll only have to do it once because the > performance test script is careful not to wreck the repo it works on)= =2E OK, I thought we only had the synthetic patches and haven't bothered looking at the scripts. --=20 Catalin