From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
To: Karl Wiberg <kha@treskal.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Gustav Hållberg" <gustav@virtutech.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Record a single transaction for conflicting push operations
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:49:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0943d9e0912180749ga8857d9j975e119937db9674@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8197bcb0912180123l4657839ctc121636af3724bee@mail.gmail.com>
2009/12/18 Karl Wiberg <kha@treskal.com>:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Catalin Marinas
> <catalin.marinas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> StGit commands resulting in a conflicting patch pushing record two
>> transactions in the log (with one of them being inconsistent with
>> HEAD != top). Undoing such operations requires two "stg undo"
>> (possibly with --hard) commands which is unintuitive. This patch
>> changes such operations to only record one log entry and "stg undo"
>> reverts the stack to the state prior to the operation.
>
> Hmm, OK. It was convenient to be able to undo just the last
> conflicting step, but I guess the increase in UI complexity wasn't
> worth it.
>
> I think your patch doesn't go quite far enough, though.
> self.__conflicting_push is currently set to a function that will do
> the extra updates that take us from the first to the second state to
> save in the log; if we'll be saving at only one point, we might as
> well run those updates immediately instead of deferring them. In other
> words, the entire __conflicting_push variable could be removed.
See below for an updated patch:
Record a single transaction for conflicting push operations
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
StGit commands resulting in a conflicting patch pushing record two
transactions in the log (with one of them being inconsistent with HEAD
!= top). Undoing such operations requires two "stg undo" (possibly with
--hard) commands which is unintuitive. This patch changes such
operations to only record one log entry and "stg undo" reverts the stack
to the state prior to the operation.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Cc: Gustav Hållberg <gustav@virtutech.com>
Cc: Karl Wiberg <kha@treskal.com>
---
stgit/lib/transaction.py | 14 +++++---------
t/t3101-reset-hard.sh | 2 +-
t/t3103-undo-hard.sh | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/stgit/lib/transaction.py b/stgit/lib/transaction.py
index 30a153b..ea85d5d 100644
--- a/stgit/lib/transaction.py
+++ b/stgit/lib/transaction.py
@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ class StackTransaction(object):
self.__applied = list(self.__stack.patchorder.applied)
self.__unapplied = list(self.__stack.patchorder.unapplied)
self.__hidden = list(self.__stack.patchorder.hidden)
- self.__conflicting_push = None
self.__error = None
self.__current_tree = self.__stack.head.data.tree
self.__base = self.__stack.base
@@ -232,10 +231,9 @@ class StackTransaction(object):
self.__stack.patchorder.hidden = self.__hidden
log.log_entry(self.__stack, msg)
old_applied = self.__stack.patchorder.applied
- write(self.__msg)
- if self.__conflicting_push != None:
- self.__patches = _TransPatchMap(self.__stack)
- self.__conflicting_push()
+ if not self.__conflicts:
+ write(self.__msg)
+ else:
write(self.__msg + ' (CONFLICT)')
if print_current_patch:
_print_current_patch(old_applied, self.__applied)
@@ -371,12 +369,10 @@ class StackTransaction(object):
# We've just caused conflicts, so we must allow them in
# the final checkout.
self.__allow_conflicts = lambda trans: True
-
- # Save this update so that we can run it a little later.
- self.__conflicting_push = update
+ self.__patches = _TransPatchMap(self.__stack)
+ update()
self.__halt("%d merge conflict(s)" % len(self.__conflicts))
else:
- # Update immediately.
update()
def push_tree(self, pn):
diff --git a/t/t3101-reset-hard.sh b/t/t3101-reset-hard.sh
index bd97b3a..45e86dc 100755
--- a/t/t3101-reset-hard.sh
+++ b/t/t3101-reset-hard.sh
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ test_expect_success 'Try to reset with --hard' '
stg reset --hard master.stgit^~1 &&
stg status a > actual.txt &&
test_cmp expected.txt actual.txt &&
- test "$(echo $(stg series))" = "> p1 - p2 - p3"
+ test "$(echo $(stg series))" = "+ p1 + p2 > p3"
'
test_done
diff --git a/t/t3103-undo-hard.sh b/t/t3103-undo-hard.sh
index 2d0f382..df14b1f 100755
--- a/t/t3103-undo-hard.sh
+++ b/t/t3103-undo-hard.sh
@@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ test_expect_success 'Try to undo without --hard' '
cat > expected.txt <<EOF
EOF
-test_expect_failure 'Try to undo with --hard' '
+test_expect_success 'Try to undo with --hard' '
stg undo --hard &&
stg status a > actual.txt &&
test_cmp expected.txt actual.txt &&
- test "$(echo $(stg series))" = "> p1 - p2 - p3" &&
+ test "$(echo $(stg series))" = "+ p1 + p2 > p3" &&
test "$(stg id)" = "$(stg id $(stg top))"
'
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 23:22 [RFC PATCH] Record a single transaction for conflicting push operations Catalin Marinas
2009-12-18 9:23 ` Karl Wiberg
2009-12-18 15:49 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2009-12-19 23:50 ` Karl Wiberg
2009-12-20 23:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-12-21 7:08 ` Karl Wiberg
2009-12-21 11:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-12-21 13:48 ` Karl Wiberg
2009-12-21 14:31 ` Gustav Hållberg
2009-12-22 18:33 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0943d9e0912180749ga8857d9j975e119937db9674@mail.gmail.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gustav@virtutech.com \
--cc=kha@treskal.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).