From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DBB1F462 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726081AbfFTJe6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 05:34:58 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f51.google.com ([209.85.128.51]:36226 "EHLO mail-wm1-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725925AbfFTJe6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 05:34:58 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f51.google.com with SMTP id u8so2426097wmm.1 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 02:34:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YfA1yYC0RxwiUc1ObIt9a249uNc6/Kt35iTG8AH0mNU=; b=tmZkZmi0NSQqGEGLDIXdH+R6xnNkKOcUnoaNiTmEgfzM0hfWaIi6DO6P6a88sgtX4s LEVzGzt1hqFvcB1w+Wf7sZhBbWlCcXebFEaozgEUq7tNwM1E73PMsLxhTTLqXW5y0VV8 yYOsVnTqBeUYmBg/otjTqm5YO5duJzObr2W8Eezbkb/RO1EGqAccrO30bs2DjhnjXhL7 50JfKrSkkQL1IGwc4lg6nrmAnZQGFpdxCzQ06/NgBrnGBKoOLdgqNIs/Gy7SjHbl0TKu Zje/ob78eyxQmM61fxa/hKPw5QHhrRwgyX6uHihsQiBZiMtU3DI6J2/RwHBDlxydPoLr TLsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YfA1yYC0RxwiUc1ObIt9a249uNc6/Kt35iTG8AH0mNU=; b=WzYI8PI0OP2hRAp+CUxot9n5XoSyZ6ezOawTVJ0tXs0HZ5HAVTHABYtilqyjCaL2Ey taSfjkP+5VUzClIigqS43bcF95ex/PekWyYVAcLhnwcxCHRPD4GWMTSt3/9MIepsxUmk IUaLO9hPjHyoV1xPhVurMTGbS7c9E4uF3Bn8cnLBKYKdnuf0xYnKRw0JB/WkRrU4nmRb rdzBDbuERfmz7oFe8DGsApP9sHEUGsiA3V17oyH/x9owRhqiZA4DzFpUxuW1QepAPhhX Xwi0w+K+/VKa8kDRc0jhtJzGTE/Um2vj7FfQpPmzRHhwwek/KXO5eYt5YiJfYni1asxu CVbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVmreuJ9g0FFIKIqLPWXWWt+KeDkIvluXZLQQuHLBlCOJxHSDn8 7dWn14NZO47uFhVRwUgBjvRN4Axi X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxAdf3hqp08uNoczqbkOb2LkINRBfahffCw/7OrRYDOnZRnDEsLkumBaMa2eGZXvRT7YIYAwQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:3c8a:: with SMTP id j132mr2019593wma.172.1561023295636; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 02:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.240] (host-89-242-178-164.as13285.net. [89.242.178.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm16399260wrx.39.2019.06.20.02.34.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 02:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk Subject: Re: pw/rebase-abort-clean-rewritten, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2019, #04; Fri, 14) To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Phillip Wood , git@vger.kernel.org References: <2a37d4c2-6eec-548d-0bd0-12bbd49c8071@gmail.com> From: Phillip Wood Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:34:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB-large Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Junio & dscho On 18/06/2019 04:30, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Phillip Wood writes: > >> Yes I sent it just before I went offline, but that's a while ago now > > Yup. IIRC, you told us not to look at the patch "for now" as you > would be offline, and I was fully expecting that a regular review > exchange would happen after you come back. > > I do not recall seeing much discussion, though, but ... You're right there hasn't been much discussion I assume dscho is happy with the new version if he's asking for it to be picked up. >>> Phillip, I was under the impression that all reviewer comments had been >>> resolved. Does that match your impression? >> >> Yes, I think it's ready. Thanks for prompting me dscho, I'd seen this >> was on hold and then forgotten to write to Junio > > ... if you resolved "all reviewer comments", it must have seen > sufficient review, in which case let's merge it to 'next'. Thanks Phillip > Thanks. >