git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC3.5 02/12] send-email: No longer repeatedly test if  $smtp_server is a command
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:37:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4087cc50904191937x55f94dc3sb6fbda27f380b105@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7veivop0dx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 20:41, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> This is a minor change, but it's cleaner, and it sets up the
>> $smtp_server initialization code for future improvements.
>> ...
>> -if (!defined $smtp_server) {
>> +if (defined $smtp_server) {
>> +
>> +     $smtp_server_is_a_command = ($smtp_server =~ m{^/});
>> +
>> +} else { # use a default:
>> +
>>       foreach (qw( /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail )) {
>>               if (-x $_) {
>>                       $smtp_server = $_;
>> +                     $smtp_server_is_a_command = 1;
>>                       last;
>>               }
>>       }
>> -     $smtp_server ||= 'localhost'; # could be 127.0.0.1, too... *shrug*
>> +
>> +     $smtp_server = 'localhost'; # 127.0.0.1 is not compatible with IPv6
>> +             unless $smtp_server_is_a_command;
>
> Nobody suggests to use 127.0.0.1 anymore with this change, so why not just
> get rid of that comment?

Fine with me.

> Also the new statement looks wrong.
>
>  (1) you have ';' after assignment before the statement modifier "unless";
>     I do not think you meant it.  I generally *dis*like statement
>     modifiers, but if you use it, at least please use it correctly.

How embarassing. That's actually been fixed on my end since I sent
that patch; for some reason, I forget to send the update; sorry for
wasting your time.

>  (2) earlier, when $smtp_server is defined (say, the name of your smtp
>     host) but is not a command, we did not set smtp_server to
>     'localhost', but kept the value given by the user.  Now you seem to
>     kill the user's wish with this change.

I think you misread the code (with the exception of the error on my
part). The code could be read:

	if $smtp_server is already defined {
		determine whether it is a command;
	} else {
		find a suitable default for it;
	}

> I think a genuine improvement would be something like:
>
>        if (!defined $smtp_server) {
>                $smtp_server = 'localhost';
>        }

You don't care to search for a possible sendmail?

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-20  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-18 17:01 [PATCH RFC3.5 00/12] Introduction to Decreasing send-email Entropy Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:01 ` [PATCH RFC3.5 01/12] send-email: Cleanup the usage text and docs a bit Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:01   ` [PATCH RFC3.5 02/12] send-email: No longer repeatedly test if $smtp_server is a command Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:01     ` [PATCH RFC3.5 03/12] send-email: Interpret --smtp-server "" as "use a default" Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:02       ` [PATCH RFC3.5 04/12] send-email: Verification for --smtp-server and --smpt-server-port Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:02         ` [PATCH RFC3.5 05/12] send-email: Improve redability and error-handling in send_message's sendmail code Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:02           ` [PATCH RFC3.5 06/12] send-email: Cleanup and streamline the SMTP code in send_message Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:02             ` [PATCH RFC3.5 07/12] send-email: Cleanup send_message 'log' code Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:02               ` [PATCH RFC3.5 08/12] send-email: Move Subject sanitization from --compose code to send_message Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:02                 ` [PATCH RFC3.5 09/12] Docs: send-email: Reorganize the CONFIGURATION section Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:02                   ` [PATCH RFC3.5 10/12] Docs: Embolden the CONFIGURATION references Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:02                     ` [PATCH RFC3.5 11/12] Docs: send-email: Clarification of sendemail.<identity> Michael Witten
2009-04-18 17:02                       ` [PATCH RFC3.5 12/12] Docs: send-email: git send-email -> 'send-email' Michael Witten
2009-04-19  1:54                 ` [PATCH RFC3.5 08/12] send-email: Move Subject sanitization from --compose code to send_message Jay Soffian
2009-04-19  2:37                   ` Michael Witten
2009-04-19 14:13                     ` Jay Soffian
2009-04-19 14:39                       ` Michael Witten
2009-04-19 14:53                         ` Michael Witten
2009-04-19 16:43                         ` [PATCH RFC3.5.1 08/12] send-email: Simplify --compose subject sanitation Michael Witten
2009-04-21  2:34                           ` Jeff King
2009-04-21  3:29                             ` Michael Witten
2009-04-20  1:42             ` [PATCH RFC3.5 06/12] send-email: Cleanup and streamline the SMTP code in send_message Junio C Hamano
2009-04-20  5:38               ` Michael Witten
2009-04-20  6:43                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-19  1:51           ` [PATCH RFC3.5 05/12] send-email: Improve redability and error-handling in send_message's sendmail code Jay Soffian
2009-04-19  2:13             ` Michael Witten
2009-04-19  2:17               ` Thomas Adam
2009-04-19  2:43                 ` Michael Witten
2009-04-19  4:44                   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-19 13:49                     ` [PATCH RFC3.5.1 05/12] send-email: Improve readability " Michael Witten
2009-04-19 14:16                 ` [PATCH RFC3.5 05/12] send-email: Improve redability " Jay Soffian
2009-04-20  1:38           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-20  1:58             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-21  2:00               ` Jeff King
2009-04-21  3:14                 ` Jeff King
2009-04-19 14:19         ` [PATCH RFC3.5.1 04/12] send-email: Verification for --smtp-server and --smpt-server-port Michael Witten
2009-04-20 15:53           ` Michael Witten
2009-04-20  1:42         ` [PATCH RFC3.5 " Junio C Hamano
2009-04-20  2:38           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-20  3:49             ` Michael Witten
2009-04-20  3:49             ` [PATCH RFC3.5 06/12] send-email: Cleanup and streamline the SMTP code in send_message Michael Witten
2009-04-18 23:35       ` [PATCH RFC3.5 03/12] send-email: Interpret --smtp-server "" as "use a default" Wesley J. Landaker
2009-04-19  0:13         ` Michael Witten
2009-04-19 14:16           ` [PATCH RFC3.5.1 " Michael Witten
2009-04-20  1:41       ` [PATCH RFC3.5 " Junio C Hamano
2009-04-20  2:52         ` Michael Witten
2009-04-20  1:41     ` [PATCH RFC3.5 02/12] send-email: No longer repeatedly test if $smtp_server is a command Junio C Hamano
2009-04-20  2:37       ` Michael Witten [this message]
2009-04-20  4:21         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-20  4:53           ` Subject: " Michael Witten

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b4087cc50904191937x55f94dc3sb6fbda27f380b105@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mfwitten@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).