From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Witten Subject: Re: [doc] User Manual Suggestion Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:31:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200904240051.46233.johan@herland.net> <200904242230.13239.johan@herland.net> <20090424213848.GA14493@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090424231436.GA15058@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Daniel Barkalow , Johan Herland , git@vger.kernel.org, David Abrahams , "J. Bruce Fields" To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 25 01:33:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LxUtC-0002M2-Kw for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:33:03 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752649AbZDXXb3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:31:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751924AbZDXXb2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:31:28 -0400 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.25]:9740 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751052AbZDXXb1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:31:27 -0400 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1147710qwd.37 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:31:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xgPyb3P8TZTsRB7Zsil+TlfSODQ7iaV4/6zsfclIbCE=; b=b+F1wFohvkdhJM+uuBdNaMevjJ7Ag6SC3YoC24PkvaNIE5ZH76IeyWxD1ScGTF8Jle XxpeOnPCL2rt335dr99jcJ9d32AmUD7Uz5owHwpltiyfFobsCf9XLCllNrBdveKM07n7 M8vb6q8iovWtBXVPvKOYItbnq37tWKrLGNCKY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Qq9AaIHYYaf8hB/guh5P/FpInndOAYmPDhNzjH3UUpve602bdm96n/9mjxS6fATO6d Mc7QBoEb6dpYxgdeHEmmesB7g4fuZWhrNEpAFQn1VeXgYiI1Ixsxighbpa3TxuqIor0w ZKmfY4+AHsMrEPJl1Gig+q+d+lVUcRphBdpOE= Received: by 10.224.37.19 with SMTP id v19mr3660201qad.70.1240615887048; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:31:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090424231436.GA15058@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 18:14, Jeff King wrote: > Junio suggested "object name" in another thread, which I think is nicely > descriptive. The reason I don't like "object name" is that "name" has connotations that don't go well with the idea of referencing. Isn't "address" (or "location") better in this sense?