From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Witten Subject: Re: Google Code: Support for Mercurial and Analysis of Git and Mercurial Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:45:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200904260703.31243.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <49F475B8.20903@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jakub Narebski , Christian Couder , git@vger.kernel.org To: gitzilla@gmail.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 27 11:48:27 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ly7Wh-0007XE-3M for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:48:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756155AbZDZQp4 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:45:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754839AbZDZQp4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:45:56 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.221.180]:44284 "EHLO mail-qy0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756132AbZDZQpy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:45:54 -0400 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so816682qyk.33 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:45:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5sV5R92H4stHc7sollW1r5LAh+7MTF9kOqWeucaAtko=; b=xv9IAtAnqvJTQvOSWR/c4su8RlVBbGp8H7i5LvXba2ez638mwk6BcBzcV+T+djt/tI Fy9GYtTOxjHNdqpNRzVn8W7ZMqC8fICYcr5Oor681UFbLlF072iLM+CQFA8tyJaAGnSd JroxT9AYBEWp2rQBaJnKZeaPpdlzD3Vt60Ifs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qeZeWdIL02kjdDlJrQZDmlnqIDPvOOOw+UNaFRAM4rocC9OF3ovienyZEBW1aN5CI1 hriYRoiR2XpF4v9dAlDE7uyyihdfA0vla7YCsQorl+68ImDI3CCGe/L1CKBD7FWLT3+/ biomJ/I7bDx4fu5nGhyhvxNyL5tVDHnnqitIQ= Received: by 10.224.28.136 with SMTP id m8mr4835117qac.82.1240764353969; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:45:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49F475B8.20903@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 09:54, A Large Angry SCM w= rote: > Another important criteria was which, both or neither of Git and Hg w= ould > actually work and perform well on top of Google Code's underling stor= age > system and except to mention they would be using Bigtable, the report= did > not discuss this. Git on top of Bigtable will not perform well. > > Read the paper and do the math if you are interested. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://labs.google.com/papers/bigtable-osdi06.pdf > If the math is so simple, then surely you could have supplied a quick overview of the problem. Nobody likes "this is left as an exercise for the reader".