From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Witten Subject: Re: [doc] User Manual Suggestion Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 20:26:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200904240051.46233.johan@herland.net> <20090424213848.GA14493@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090424231632.GB10155@atjola.homenet> <20090502155348.GB6135@atjola.homenet> <20090502211110.GC6135@atjola.homenet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Steinbrink?= , Jeff King , Daniel Barkalow , Johan Herland , git@vger.kernel.org, David Abrahams , "J. Bruce Fields" To: Mark Lodato X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 03 03:26:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M0QTE-0008OJ-B5 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 03:26:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753545AbZECB0I (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 21:26:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753430AbZECB0G (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 21:26:06 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f196.google.com ([209.85.221.196]:53783 "EHLO mail-qy0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753389AbZECB0D (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 21:26:03 -0400 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so4532917qyk.33 for ; Sat, 02 May 2009 18:26:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UvaR0hxKY5GBssNlHhOcInWFni/u6REGwZtp6uPUvRM=; b=pNlpkXwco8tkE1zdB0iGtP9pyQJf9skx8GoFAuPeuUwREjGv/GRong1yZdlAmY6Ezh 147jTmY9VBreEeY7ivQtbugrbQ/VZbLZMRbRlOmijSkI9edkxN68gq1CGKXjH7ZOMVaN 44+fFLJGE1aJ/lxfNerwH7xJ3QELSF7Xc7s70= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=X+teZi6buwCbIWkaHrYHndsT4InXfIu6swSOltSs/rQrkIIhYyyCdn1UFnE47kHb/H q5R3OQdzism4GxTWE4Tfe2HhUdZAW3Avdni36Zk5HdNJ5QNhcuJ8GQXk9wMnsXlCQb+n JKUngtckWkn+2mQsNSFnzvpbfd6Asi9V9WKJs= Received: by 10.224.10.208 with SMTP id q16mr4517902qaq.387.1241313963381; Sat, 02 May 2009 18:26:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 20:18, Mark Lodato wrote: > 2009/5/2 Michael Witten : >> I also dislike the use of 'name' rather than 'hash'; a name is >> something provided by the user, but a hash is something computed. The >> use of sha[-]1 is even more egregious. > > What about "identifier" as a compromise between "hash" and "name"? > This is really what we're talking about - a way of identifying > objects. It's the same problem, in my opinion. '[Cryptographic] hash' says so much more and still remains quite generic. Also, continuing with 'sha1' doesn't seem satisfactory: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=124068702303042&w=2