From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Hunt Subject: Re: /etc in git? Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:40:22 -0800 Message-ID: References: <7vlkxckf7o.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 19 05:40:30 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzRb1-0007a9-Ej for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 05:40:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161310AbWASEkZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:40:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161311AbWASEkZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:40:25 -0500 Received: from uproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.92.194]:48936 "EHLO uproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161310AbWASEkY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:40:24 -0500 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s2so82457uge for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:40:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=j9us0pwyF1tnCuCmKQnXlRiLNXK61qSk5+7oW3L4lBCnJfPc9zHqZbd9f68ZqznmiP9cAvjU81c7hxg+6alUn7pTE1kkEN4lZovrBssUUsojI3aWcjChs1Y7aOQq2bhYX9Fh6SlB+vhzLF0cRFZiyTUTXNkHchYj9cbyNiqvtbI= Received: by 10.48.211.16 with SMTP id j16mr10125nfg; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.162.7 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:40:22 -0800 (PST) To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <7vlkxckf7o.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Do you have any more details by chance? Does it work? Does it work well? How does one do it? --adam On 1/18/06, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Adam Hunt writes: > > > ... Has anyone ever tried to version their /ect with > > git? > > Yes. > >