From: Karl Wiberg <kha@treskal.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Gustav Hållberg" <gustav@virtutech.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Record a single transaction for conflicting push operations
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:23:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8197bcb0912180123l4657839ctc121636af3724bee@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091217232212.4869.43002.stgit@toshiba-laptop>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@gmail.com> wrote:
> StGit commands resulting in a conflicting patch pushing record two
> transactions in the log (with one of them being inconsistent with
> HEAD != top). Undoing such operations requires two "stg undo"
> (possibly with --hard) commands which is unintuitive. This patch
> changes such operations to only record one log entry and "stg undo"
> reverts the stack to the state prior to the operation.
Hmm, OK. It was convenient to be able to undo just the last
conflicting step, but I guess the increase in UI complexity wasn't
worth it.
I think your patch doesn't go quite far enough, though.
self.__conflicting_push is currently set to a function that will do
the extra updates that take us from the first to the second state to
save in the log; if we'll be saving at only one point, we might as
well run those updates immediately instead of deferring them. In other
words, the entire __conflicting_push variable could be removed.
--
Karl Wiberg, kha@treskal.com
subrabbit.wordpress.com
www.treskal.com/kalle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 23:22 [RFC PATCH] Record a single transaction for conflicting push operations Catalin Marinas
2009-12-18 9:23 ` Karl Wiberg [this message]
2009-12-18 15:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-12-19 23:50 ` Karl Wiberg
2009-12-20 23:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-12-21 7:08 ` Karl Wiberg
2009-12-21 11:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-12-21 13:48 ` Karl Wiberg
2009-12-21 14:31 ` Gustav Hållberg
2009-12-22 18:33 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b8197bcb0912180123l4657839ctc121636af3724bee@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kha@treskal.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gustav@virtutech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).