Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: Git mailing list <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] setup: communicate why a directory is not a valid git directory
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 17:59:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b829d416-f36e-454e-a141-3fc93fd62cb3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ar0ywAlMDuzK1Hvb@pks.im>

On 9/30/26 21:33, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 03:55:10PM +0530, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
>> At the moment, there are a few scenarios in which the error message
>> surrounding an invalid Git repository is a bit blunt:
>>
>>    $ GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY=/does/not/exist git --git-dir repo.git rev-parse --is-bare-repository
>>    fatal: not a git repository: 'repo.git'
>>
>> In this case, even though repo.git is a valid Git repository,
>> we get an output saying it is not since the GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY
>> does not point to a valid object directory. At the moment, the
>> user is on their own in figuring this out.
>>
>> Instead, make it more easy for users to figure such issues
> 
> s/more easy/easier/
>

Ah. Will correct.

>> particularly in cases where they have explicitly specified
>> a Git directory. This intends to improve the error reporting UX
>> by clarifying why the specified repository is not considered valid.
> 
> Which I think is a good motivation.
> 
>> We achieve this by means of using the new helper
>> is_git_directory_verbose() that has been introduced. With the
>> same, we get a more helpful error message as follows:
>>
>>    $ GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY=/does/not/exist git --git-dir repo.git rev-parse --is-bare-repository
>>    fatal: not a git repository: 'repo.git'
>>    reason: cannot access object directory '/does/not/exist' set via $GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY
> 
> Having a separate "reason:" line feels a bit off to me, but that may be
> subjective. I'd have preferred to have it on the same line, or maybe
> first have "error:" followed by "fatal:".
> 

Hmm. Let me think which of these I could adopt. Thank you for the 
suggestion.

>> diff --git a/setup.c b/setup.c
>> index a0fb68f7f6..a0d3c0c5bb 100644
>> --- a/setup.c
>> +++ b/setup.c
>> @@ -1195,6 +1195,7 @@ static void repo_discover_explicit_gitdir(struct repo_discovery *discovery,
>>   					  int *nongit_ok)
>>   {
>>   	const char *work_tree_env = getenv(GIT_WORK_TREE_ENVIRONMENT);
>> +	struct strbuf invalid_gitdir_reason = STRBUF_INIT;
> 
> Nit, please feel free to ignore: I'd just have called this `errbuf`.
> 

Noted.

-- 
Sivaraam


      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 12:02 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Improve error reporting to mention "why" a directory is not a repository Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-24 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] t0009: add tests to cover more error reporting scenarios Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-24 22:08   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-25 13:46     ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-24 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] setup: introduce new helper 'is_git_directory_verbose' Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-24 22:11   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-25 17:51     ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-24 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] setup: communicate why a directory is not a valid git directory Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-24 22:16   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-25 14:33     ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-29 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Improve error reporting to mention "why" a directory is not a repository Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-29 10:25   ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] setup: normalize an if-else to follow our convention Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-29 10:25   ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] t0009: add tests to cover more error reporting scenarios Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-29 10:25   ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] setup: introduce new helper 'is_git_directory_verbose' Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-30 16:03     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-05 12:14       ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-30 18:32     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-29 10:25   ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] setup: communicate why a directory is not a valid git directory Kaartic Sivaraam
2026-09-30 16:03     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-05 12:29       ` Kaartic Sivaraam [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b829d416-f36e-454e-a141-3fc93fd62cb3@gmail.com \
    --to=kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox