Re: git-stash: RFC: Adopt the default behavior to other commands

["André Goddard Rosa" <andre.goddard@gmail.com>]

On Dec 18, 2007 1:42 PM, Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Junio C Hamano schrieb am Mon 17. Dec, 16:31 (-0800):
> > Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr> writes:
> >
> > >> Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr> writes:
> > >>
> > >>> ...  The current behavior of git stash is very
> > >>> dangerous ...
> > > ...
> > >> This is a plain FUD, isn't it?  The first Oops should not happen these
> > >> days.
> >
> > But the original point by Sebastian hasn't been answered.  He wanted to
> > make the command list the stash without arguments.
> >
> > This was discussed already in the early days of stash and there indeed
> > was a suggestion to do so (I think I sided with that), but the users did
> > not want it.  IIRC, the argument went like: "when I say 'stash', that is
> > because I want a quick and immediate way to stash, and I do not want a
> > list.  If I do not have to have a quick way, I would create a temporary
> > commit on the current branch, or switch to a temporary branch and commit
> > there."
>
> When it should go quick why don't use an alias. git stash can print the
> list and everyone who wants a quick stash can create an alias for this.
>
> I vote for stash print the list, because I dropped in the pitfall.
>

I got caught by this default too. One vote more!

Regards,
-- 
[]s,
André Goddard