git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>,
	Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
	Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
	Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 10:53:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b92b5d93-7f7f-4370-ac79-7d9767bb0db5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aDp55upE6AhYunz7@ArchLinux>

Hi Shejialuo

On 31/05/2025 04:39, shejialuo wrote:
> diff --git a/refs/files-backend.c b/refs/files-backend.c
> index 4d1f65a57a..bf6f89b1d1 100644
> --- a/refs/files-backend.c
> +++ b/refs/files-backend.c
> @@ -3762,6 +3762,9 @@ static int files_fsck_refs_dir(struct ref_store *ref_store,
>   
>   	iter = dir_iterator_begin(sb.buf, 0);
>   	if (!iter) {
> +		if (errno == ENOENT && !is_main_worktree(wt))
> +			goto out;
> +
>   		ret = error_errno(_("cannot open directory %s"), sb.buf);
>   		goto out;
>   	}

I think it would be clearer to write this as

	if (is_main_worktree(wt) || errno != ENOENT)
		ret = error_errno(_("cannot open directory %s"), sb.buf);
	goto out;

so that the condition that triggers the error message is explicit rather 
than having to mentally invert the condition to figure out when we 
return an error

Best Wishes

Phillip

> diff --git a/t/t0602-reffiles-fsck.sh b/t/t0602-reffiles-fsck.sh
> index f671ac4d3a..615b7c0683 100755
> --- a/t/t0602-reffiles-fsck.sh
> +++ b/t/t0602-reffiles-fsck.sh
> @@ -110,6 +110,21 @@ test_expect_success 'ref name check should be adapted into fsck messages' '
>   	)
>   '
>   
> +test_expect_success 'no refs directory of worktree should not cause problems' '
> +	test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" &&
> +	git init repo &&
> +	(
> +		cd repo &&
> +		test_commit initial &&
> +
> +		git worktree add --detach ./worktree &&
> +		# Simulate old directory layout
> +		rm -rf ./git/worktrees/worktree/refs &&
> +		git refs verify 2>err &&
> +		test_must_be_empty err
> +	)
> +'
> +
>   test_expect_success 'ref name check should work for multiple worktrees' '
>   	test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" &&
>   	git init repo &&


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-02  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-30 19:00 [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs kristofferhaugsbakk
2025-05-30 22:23 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-05-31  1:03   ` shejialuo
2025-05-31  9:52   ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-05-31  3:39 ` [PATCH] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees shejialuo
2025-05-31 12:17   ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-06-02  1:33     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-02 11:30     ` shejialuo
2025-06-02  9:53   ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2025-06-02 10:24     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-06-02 13:50       ` phillip.wood123
2025-06-02 19:49       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-02 12:16     ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 12:41   ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 13:26   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs shejialuo
2025-06-02 13:29     ` [PATCH v2 1/1] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees shejialuo
2025-06-02 13:59       ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-06-02 14:11         ` shejialuo
2025-06-02 14:40     ` [PATCH v3 0/1] [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs shejialuo
2025-06-02 14:41       ` [PATCH v3 1/1] fsck: ignore missing "refs" directory for linked worktrees shejialuo
2025-06-02 15:01       ` [PATCH v3 0/1] [BUG] refs: verify does not work if there are v2.43.0 or older worktrees w/o wt. refs Kristoffer Haugsbakk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b92b5d93-7f7f-4370-ac79-7d9767bb0db5@gmail.com \
    --to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=shejialuo@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).