From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com (sendmail.purelymail.com [34.202.193.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BEBB42BC46 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 03:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=34.202.193.197 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784086137; cv=none; b=Xb8Gve2O2nxI5M8cMMJ0HhWnBUiZTPNs977g6HIRM5ofHjqfjzBqoY6Kn/KmfOMMdbC+YUKmINSM42bTtPnYoK8/PZlSfEVXBIR40dto1BFvCnnCAYf8VDtU23bZeKL3T6zRHxNRDseheECftqy3Sn11n6sQpdsm42HtHHV6hIY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784086137; c=relaxed/simple; bh=grEBZ4Mbbw2j1uKL+tnp68EYHyMYYImChfFa3/J5lsI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=CMCWXh1gS0B0cr/Zx2j4xWxJDjBou7E6Lh/hoB9BVTJo4B7Wvq0YM8CSLAzj66bBEhlgW/x/62L51jdymyt7SOGHnTTvu+6grEwojpYShvrYZbCw1hQU7fCqoum5rqscFgg5SwLYviDYRKQvEuO4MEgJDOtW50iMNG4sC6G5Ltc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=malon.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=malon.dev; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=malon.dev header.i=@malon.dev header.b=f1XKy9l/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=purelymail.com header.i=@purelymail.com header.b=YmIvL/Te; arc=none smtp.client-ip=34.202.193.197 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=malon.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=malon.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=malon.dev header.i=@malon.dev header.b="f1XKy9l/"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=purelymail.com header.i=@purelymail.com header.b="YmIvL/Te" DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=f1XKy9l/bZlg5BtPKJu48MC+jZ+v72d/fJaWYXEHagR84jVw81eTNTxts5Xf9KlNcnyPX25SB3IP6ZljoU7O/ola6RXVvNMrak+g4Ungo2vdYjIqELwmAvlrCzXr7gTc30VgZjWqHu3KTxggOnMlswMELggcx3ULzoQVfHNJbfz/YundxRqwbESB8jQHzYhm4tWzvOIspE0K0JZef4So0oXE1S0nfy1UdDLeJTfPKZ9RNuvImAmW5dIs3N+iN5JpmCL2X2SacSUseoLd+A/zTXJe5VCQlKN62FAGeSajl+kdLc+JUCwjGHkirxzDgK9hkU6W7vnCabGbPkWdmHcnDg==; s=purelymail1; d=malon.dev; v=1; bh=grEBZ4Mbbw2j1uKL+tnp68EYHyMYYImChfFa3/J5lsI=; h=Received:Date:Subject:To:From; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=YmIvL/TeHBupe/UQ3fUcyXryJR4xXX/Yfs/e4UpJnoizIWIEcbyckLp1GgVidixtFHhPzmwPBJ0xA/JtIrSJsAr45BMc03ZkQH+6UHs6Qni5PhLil23neaoyYzZqOL2752+j8JMQn3rOQfEK695YWQXRVC2TDYpCUDpSrVEsZVlH+ZOi9jnqM1H4dqGdnkOAIfICmluricZeAkrYrb7A07IbUBK9Yu0eywmJw/aA5+DdNXu7yRFjBxZCvhoLGPl6pJYc6gvdxMbFsaxLQIdJDEKw3TO4ESh7oJovPoZYAbjjhzaEWAQeLgyRy7C8BcgVFbeB9vSypnLP7nhtis0tjw==; s=purelymail1; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=grEBZ4Mbbw2j1uKL+tnp68EYHyMYYImChfFa3/J5lsI=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:Date:Subject:To:From; Feedback-ID: 599969:32685:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: git@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id 2076641313; (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Wed, 15 Jul 2026 03:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:28:48 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] environment: migrate 'trust_executable_bit' into 'repo_config_values' Content-Language: en-US To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im, Christian Couder , Ayush Chandekar , Olamide Caleb Bello References: <20260612160527.167203-1-cat@malon.dev> <20260619162105.648495-1-cat@malon.dev> From: Tian Yuchen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/30/26 04:55, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Tian Yuchen writes: > >> The 'core.filemode' (stored as 'trust_executable_bit') configuration >> act as a core filesystem capability flag. > > This unfortunately hasn't heard any responses since June 19th. Are > there remaining issues with it? Or do people fundamentally have > objections against this change? Or things are too busy in general > that there are more patches than there are folks willing to review > them? Seems that no many people are viewing this. Let me send V5 which includes a new commit and a few changes. Hope this helps. Thanks, yuchen