From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Derrick Stolee" <dstolee@microsoft.com>,
"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Makefile: add prove and coverage-prove targets
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:35:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb17112d-2869-741f-de13-3971a995032e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190129160030.GA7083@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 1/29/2019 11:00 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 06:56:08AM -0800, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
>> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
>>
>> When running the test suite for code coverage using
>> 'make coverage-test', a single test failure stops the
>> test suite from completing. This leads to significant
>> undercounting of covered blocks.
>>
>> Add two new targets to the Makefile:
>>
>> * 'prove' runs the test suite using 'prove'.
>>
>> * 'coverage-prove' compiles the source using the
>> coverage flags, then runs the test suite using
>> 'prove'.
>>
>> These targets are modeled after the 'test' and
>> 'coverage-test' targets.
>
> I think these are reasonable to have (and I personally much prefer
> "prove" to the raw "make test" output anyway).
>
> For people who don't have "prove" available, I think they could just do
> "make -k test" to make sure the full suite runs. Should we perhaps be
> doing that automatically in the sub-make run by coverage-test?
I wanted to avoid changing the existing behavior, if I could. But, if
we can reasonably assume that anyone running 'make coverage-test' wants
to run the full suite even with failures, then that's fine by me.
I see from the make docs that '-k' will still result in an error code
at the end of the command, so no automation would result in an incorrect
response to a failed test. Am I correct?
>> @@ -3077,6 +3080,10 @@ coverage-test: coverage-clean-results coverage-compile
>> $(MAKE) CFLAGS="$(COVERAGE_CFLAGS)" LDFLAGS="$(COVERAGE_LDFLAGS)" \
>> DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET=test -j1 test
>>
>> +coverage-prove: coverage-clean-results coverage-compile
>> + $(MAKE) CFLAGS="$(COVERAGE_CFLAGS)" LDFLAGS="$(COVERAGE_LDFLAGS)" \
>> + DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET=prove -j1 prove
>> +
>
> You probably don't need to override DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET here, since the
> "prove" target doesn't look at it. Likewise, "-j1" probably does nothing
> here, since prove itself is a single target.
As Szeder mentioned, I can probably just drop the 'prove' target and use
DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET instead. Or do we think anyone will want to use
'make prove' from root?
> I'm not sure why we want to enforce -j1 for these targets, but if it's
> important to do so for the prove case, as well, you'd need to add it to
> GIT_PROVE_OPTS.
The '-j1' is necessary because the coverage data is collected in a way that
is not thread-safe. Our compile options also force single-threaded behavior.
I'll specifically override GIT_PROVE_OPTS here to force -j1, but also send
-j1 to the 'make' command, too.
Thanks,
-Stolee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-29 14:56 [PATCH 0/1] Makefile: add prove and coverage-prove targets Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-01-29 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-01-29 15:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-29 15:58 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-01-29 16:37 ` Derrick Stolee
2019-01-29 16:49 ` Jeff King
2019-01-29 17:34 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-01-29 18:10 ` Derrick Stolee
2019-01-29 20:49 ` Derrick Stolee
2019-01-29 21:58 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-01-29 16:00 ` Jeff King
2019-01-29 16:35 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2019-01-29 16:46 ` Jeff King
2019-01-29 21:03 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-01-29 22:38 ` Jeff King
2019-01-30 12:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-30 13:08 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-01-30 18:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-30 19:32 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-01-31 7:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-01-29 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2019-01-29 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] Makefile: add coverage-prove target Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb17112d-2869-741f-de13-3971a995032e@gmail.com \
--to=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).