git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "alturin marlinon" <alturin@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SoC RFC] git statistics - information about commits
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:41:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd6139dc0803230841l93cdd0do39bf6c35a5d732fa@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0803231523110.4353@racer.site>

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>  I think you will have to go to the line level to achieve what Junio
>  suggested.

I'm not sure what you mean with "go to the line level"?
Do you mean that using a Graph is not possible?

>  Timezones are recorded as epoch (seconds since Jan 1, 1970) and timezone.
>  So yes, you have that, _provided_ you trust the users to set up that thing
>  correctly.

Yeah, I'll trust the user on this ;).
If the timezone is stored as well this should be easy to do, sweet.


>  > >  * Identify "buggy commits" from history, without testing.  Zeroth order
>  >
>  > A feature like this would fit well with the other "buggy
>  > commit/maintainer detection" but would require a lot of customization.
>  > However, considering git already comes with a good customization
>  > system it should still be feasible.
>
>  Yes.  And it would be really interesting for me.  Until it shows that I am
>  the biggest offender, of course.

Maybe we can put in an if-check for user "Johannes Schindelin"? ;)

>  I think the bigger problem is not visualising it, but finding what is
>  buggy, and what not.

Yes, ofcourse, I think I'll be busy mostly following lines across
commits and after that determining if a commit is buggy or not.

>  I think it can be vague about the order in which things will be
>  implemented.  And the features which you think might be too complicated
>  should be marked as such: "possible extension (which might not be finished
>  within this project): <blabla>".

Cool, I think I can start on a RC for my application then! (Maybe I
should'of tracked it with git, then I could tag it...)

Thanks for the feedback, I really want to come up with a superb application!

Sverre

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-23 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-21  8:52 [SoC RFC] git statistics - information about commits alturin marlinon
2008-03-21  9:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-21 13:51   ` Martin Langhoff
2008-03-21 13:56     ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-22 19:40   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-23 14:07     ` alturin marlinon
2008-03-23 14:28       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-23 15:41         ` alturin marlinon [this message]
2008-03-23 16:32           ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-23 17:31       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-23 21:32         ` alturin marlinon
2008-03-21 14:49 ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bd6139dc0803230841l93cdd0do39bf6c35a5d732fa@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=alturin@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).