From: "alturin marlinon" <alturin@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SoC RFC] git statistics - information about commits
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:41:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd6139dc0803230841l93cdd0do39bf6c35a5d732fa@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0803231523110.4353@racer.site>
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> I think you will have to go to the line level to achieve what Junio
> suggested.
I'm not sure what you mean with "go to the line level"?
Do you mean that using a Graph is not possible?
> Timezones are recorded as epoch (seconds since Jan 1, 1970) and timezone.
> So yes, you have that, _provided_ you trust the users to set up that thing
> correctly.
Yeah, I'll trust the user on this ;).
If the timezone is stored as well this should be easy to do, sweet.
> > > * Identify "buggy commits" from history, without testing. Zeroth order
> >
> > A feature like this would fit well with the other "buggy
> > commit/maintainer detection" but would require a lot of customization.
> > However, considering git already comes with a good customization
> > system it should still be feasible.
>
> Yes. And it would be really interesting for me. Until it shows that I am
> the biggest offender, of course.
Maybe we can put in an if-check for user "Johannes Schindelin"? ;)
> I think the bigger problem is not visualising it, but finding what is
> buggy, and what not.
Yes, ofcourse, I think I'll be busy mostly following lines across
commits and after that determining if a commit is buggy or not.
> I think it can be vague about the order in which things will be
> implemented. And the features which you think might be too complicated
> should be marked as such: "possible extension (which might not be finished
> within this project): <blabla>".
Cool, I think I can start on a RC for my application then! (Maybe I
should'of tracked it with git, then I could tag it...)
Thanks for the feedback, I really want to come up with a superb application!
Sverre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-23 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-21 8:52 [SoC RFC] git statistics - information about commits alturin marlinon
2008-03-21 9:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-21 13:51 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-03-21 13:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-22 19:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-23 14:07 ` alturin marlinon
2008-03-23 14:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-23 15:41 ` alturin marlinon [this message]
2008-03-23 16:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-23 17:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-23 21:32 ` alturin marlinon
2008-03-21 14:49 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd6139dc0803230841l93cdd0do39bf6c35a5d732fa@mail.gmail.com \
--to=alturin@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).