From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sverre Rabbelier" Subject: Re: [PATCH] "not uptodate" changed to "has local changes" Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 22:14:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1209833972-12256-1-git-send-email-timcharper@gmail.com> <1ED37CF1-EABD-4881-BA29-ED2CB1CE73FC@sb.org> Reply-To: sverre@rabbelier.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Steven Walter" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Goddard_Rosa?=" , "Kevin Ballard" , "Mike Ralphson" , "Tim Harper" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Johannes Schindelin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 17 22:15:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JxSoc-0000th-Cq for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 17 May 2008 22:15:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755711AbYEQUOr (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2008 16:14:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755308AbYEQUOr (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2008 16:14:47 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.174]:42577 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753497AbYEQUOq (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2008 16:14:46 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so699738wfd.4 for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 13:14:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ShVAmmsPUgVvr7jjheIZ2JmZOXVcRgyZlnKa3wZt12w=; b=fpZRI0feIoxZeP1AdX7RJhzAiAxGEkgtxhJJwZDTzIY0xn7i2JBRE+FYEFACfITUgebtxioNnR8aj6CfU8ouL1PPkVhq7X9q2pgGubD6/zDAs+B+2UERvxlmWCmbL9/KVcvQnmHPU4z1V0BYashgn+sb58yIItbF8KzDmdx5UvI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HVEmnl2JG0M87K+MJvnFsw7MBh0nAwtDpi4xQFGGAp7TfBSsRfMh+lC5WnF+NPsriZDcVpmj1yibMKQh9Kc24fMt+i8UiwgGBvKUM99xcq7S0Vt18TaXT9aqXvIHFY0rY5VGuYhvTO+I5CN4bRNCYkmevdHk9WNNVZj/eYn36RQ= Received: by 10.142.126.17 with SMTP id y17mr2136575wfc.170.1211055285568; Sat, 17 May 2008 13:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.33.6 with HTTP; Sat, 17 May 2008 13:14:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Johannes Schindelin > But I strongly disagree with the notion that it is okay to fsck with > old-timers (who would be harmed by breaking backwards-incompatibility, > and nobody else), especially given that it is mostly old-timers who turned > Git into the Good Product(tm) it is. But those old-timers can be updated can't they? Also, shouldn't we have tests to see if they 'break' because of changes? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier