From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sverre Rabbelier" Subject: Re: Reverting to old commit Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 01:00:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8345bd80805271050q7412917bt292a276fbbe6aed3@mail.gmail.com> <6IRlPIxadiyIIPsto-MFx6wInl0VvCRxVSaI3-OglmCjLt5obfbiww@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil> Reply-To: sverre@rabbelier.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jakub Narebski" , Marcus , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Brandon Casey" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 28 01:01:07 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K18AE-0002Xu-T4 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 01:01:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758761AbYE0XAO (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2008 19:00:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758709AbYE0XAN (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2008 19:00:13 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.175]:58609 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758514AbYE0XAM (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2008 19:00:12 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so2304597wfd.4 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 16:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=APj2/soBUyj6Bzv4QzXGYwxCallMAQvTbb9pHspQp/8=; b=bZpIOA45VswGoZPVb7Nen7WVYxKQR3z2deKw4Fre6LCf05va4x+1q/rSGgfvKD5dZ9o5rHnbE4od0FVvTXJjgekkzCUgy6ztdSgH/LoAYFHEwA1wlQz4TUxtNItTcVX007TpGWQyf8TbE3TWkoA7CnNteh5PCAY7AdLzcYJYpnQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cdt3RJxOxcMbtAEu7bDPGqgxJ+n1A5Yn6MX6nOrHGNl+le5IOllm432/8SzN02HyGX/eMJlyDOnk6/0N9kEZe6exkWZhQrLSuLibSgmYE6el9EoSGp56P6Dz4tFZleK4zF9YJmzW2DBwTwBpVdxH19sPM5ToTCp3iHZ8ZeUNvhk= Received: by 10.142.125.4 with SMTP id x4mr725354wfc.324.1211929211564; Tue, 27 May 2008 16:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.10.16 with HTTP; Tue, 27 May 2008 16:00:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6IRlPIxadiyIIPsto-MFx6wInl0VvCRxVSaI3-OglmCjLt5obfbiww@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Brandon Casey wrote: > Shouldn't we be encouraging the use of 'git log -g' rather than 'git reflog'? > git-reflog seems more like plumbing than porcelain to me. I had no idea, but then again, the man pages don't mention whether something is plumbing or porcelain anywhere... But I guess 'git log -g' is easier to use (since it supplies the user with most of git log's features) than git reflog. I was introduced to reflog by someone advising me to use it, so I was merely "passing on" that advice, unknowing of 'git log -g' :). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier