From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sverre Rabbelier" Subject: Re: [PATCH] A simple script to parse the results from the testcases Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 02:34:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1210584832-16402-3-git-send-email-srabbelier@gmail.com> <1212884291-13847-1-git-send-email-vmiklos@frugalware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, dsymonds@gmail.com To: "Miklos Vajna" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 08 02:35:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K58t0-0007av-L8 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 02:35:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755138AbYFHAea (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:34:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755145AbYFHAea (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:34:30 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.171]:63968 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755097AbYFHAe3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:34:29 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so1538066wfd.4 for ; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:34:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=ihDh/44J5v9lyXjNsUzENH/XxSZgblTVnO2Du0MZ1wY=; b=YOWa2nTtWsswAcNrOyBqgdwECqB7rnaMBBLPSZkVkrRYg22Pdt+yGMdUJSLmtSeXBu e2R2EES25iQwVIw4miX+dRZcvupKAqI9go1ZfpjYs7XDvgmE453j/iqJCWz7XtpOOlmr OiBveWif0e1B4B/++x+IwYO9c7ezmWEjxZkn0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=MNDyTBG6FQ+Ao4uYvS3D5wIQ25E4KB1BY/0p80qQHn+AaaNE7SdICaM54UI69o5ujS +F+UGVb1ZdCqEjGYVC386+UuhL99Brk2UZqhwynTBP7EOzPoUNldvANoIlZMZeBYTZx1 6aMRAL5ckELOlStbmM8UIoV4JU1dBMpEypxtM= Received: by 10.143.30.16 with SMTP id h16mr735995wfj.44.1212885265237; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.41.7 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:34:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1212884291-13847-1-git-send-email-vmiklos@frugalware.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1b7f8d87d2ea52ae Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > This is a simple script that aggregates key:value pairs in a file. > > Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna > --- > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:33:51AM +0200, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: >> This is a simple script that aggregates key:value pairs in a file. > > Here is a shell version. Just to avoid python. > > t/key_value_parser.sh | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 t/key_value_parser.sh > > diff --git a/t/key_value_parser.sh b/t/key_value_parser.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 0000000..db568fe > --- /dev/null > +++ b/t/key_value_parser.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > + > +input="/tmp/git-test-results" > + > +fixed=0 > +success=0 > +failed=0 > +broken=0 > +total=0 > + > +while read type value > +do > + case $type in > + '') > + continue ;; > + fixed) > + fixed=$(($fixed + $value)) ;; > + success) > + success=$(($success + $value)) ;; > + failed) > + failed=$(($failed + $value)) ;; > + broken) > + broken=$(( $broken + $value)) ;; > + total) > + total=$(( $total + $value)) ;; > + esac > +done < $input > + > +printf "%-8s%d\n" fixed $fixed > +printf "%-8s%d\n" success $success > +printf "%-8s%d\n" failed $failed > +printf "%-8s%d\n" broken $broken > +printf "%-8s%d\n" total $total > -- > 1.5.6.rc0.dirty Awesome, what do you want to do with the other patches? I mean, this patch on it's own doesn't make a lot of sense, but with [1/3] and [3/3] I think it deserves some proper reviewing by the list. -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier