From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sverre Rabbelier" Subject: Re: [RFH] Finding all commits that touch the same files as a specific commit Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:30:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7viqvavao4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Reply-To: sverre@rabbelier.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , "Git Mailinglist" To: "Johannes Schindelin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 14 16:32:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KIP5o-0003DA-Eu for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:31:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754024AbYGNOay (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:30:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754014AbYGNOay (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:30:54 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.169]:18218 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753814AbYGNOax (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:30:53 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so4892390wfd.4 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:30:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=LsK/iNeRo11FvFK2U+f/Q6vtQFdGvO9ATufsXtVWL0o=; b=dYU4ytOsLRfWlNMPs0Fe/ejUf+ZMulQ2TgbiKHxQOdi5r2RDDU1lrCSRTlTSVmHMA7 2p4qb+n14sMAMnVAGD+LHS46q9lWoH6PZhMWiUoRL9LPd1XpZQaxwNhNphdPZlO2X7HB xLaK75soQEe+tBCo6prat19IcmtfsHdWk0tcM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=CqGP3dS60CYzDhPg+7+jY4Ij26RulAhNcoJzQJTa2i+0GK2y81leg5had9uiFxV7XS kadwr+1l40T7dUV7TXFHGm/gdXXCOP3beDkM6yQZ5Be9yC16QL3J/unMWQUnQFYrbDkX iE6ut1WK9HIu5Le5Va2S8wVWllbq5zVcHY2EM= Received: by 10.142.142.14 with SMTP id p14mr4229660wfd.114.1216045852934; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:30:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.38.17 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:30:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > IMO following the file renames/code moves precisely is really worth the > time it takes to calculate. Otherwise, the statistics will not reflect > what was going on in the project, right? Ah, I did not mean to imply that it is not worth the time it takes to calculate, more that I do not know how to implement it that way. Of course if someone has the time/motivation to do so I would very much make use of it, but I do not have time to do so myself (at least not until after GSoC). I can have GitStats just ignore the subtree merge cases (and say that it is not beyond the scope of my project to take such into account) and have a working program by the end of GSoC. But if I spend time on getting this to work instead I might end up with a program that does follow sub-tree merges but is only half-done, and as such probably won't receive a "OK" grade. So, yes, I would very much like to see this, but no time to look into doing so myself until after GSoC. -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier