From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sverre Rabbelier" Subject: Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:10:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20080728185604.GA26322@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vproxrcvu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Reply-To: sverre@rabbelier.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Johannes Schindelin" , "Jeff King" , "Git Mailinglist" , "Miklos Vajna" To: "Junio C Hamano" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 28 22:12:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNZ4W-0008Eg-GJ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:11:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753384AbYG1UKw (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:10:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752486AbYG1UKv (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:10:51 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.174]:19713 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752136AbYG1UKv (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:10:51 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so5943284wfd.4 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:10:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=mlxLgpi0vcpIm9dCmYC/YSeSvNQbWgGLZE0hiVN1XIE=; b=q8EAhn9hFoE+SCVyoZwJ8qOM8kRlL7uBUmK1Cgyzk2UFCd+SI1W8miHoHmovpVwDNh 5q1EQMTZY2B5AFWAT7slruthLhQWoqGCd6fiMCoSq0jp5Nb/QlNZSIewFa8XQkRcQd6D 5/7VKEpvWwo5Rrqk/HUSDeES9b3X17h3LoEa4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=aI3hLXMokeLw+8gDRWeRJZ6i3+DsiDNmqdQgXPoKhgdp/4O8wg0U5lB3m7CSWU0wPz NLKA7RVXkJmuve6gzaKkneOGhtzoJ/Qh6pL7u7YWd300LIu6tm76IA5mB68JdxVh/emS 3DykyYJvHN+EglnbSPd+pPWQclI/GUikYWVEk= Received: by 10.142.177.7 with SMTP id z7mr1752449wfe.15.1217275850089; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.104.10 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:10:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7vproxrcvu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 22:07, Junio C Hamano wrote: > That reminds me of: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89178 > > to one of whose messages I sent a response today. Mhhh, but the proposed strategy there was in response to the 'insane' git-merge-theirs version, not to the 'exact opposite of git-merge-ours' that I refer to now, yes? Do you have any particular feelings wrt to that? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier