From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sverre Rabbelier" Subject: Re: JGIT: discuss: diff/patch implementation Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:31:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200811101522.13558.fg@one2team.net> <7v63mv5mro.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1226398000.7541.11.camel@minastirith.xtradesoft.lan> <20081111171816.GK2932@spearce.org> Reply-To: sverre@rabbelier.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Raimund Bauer" , "Junio C Hamano" , "Francis Galiegue" , "Git Mailing List" , "Robin Rosenberg" To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 11 18:32:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kzx6N-0004cH-Qr for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:32:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751706AbYKKRbQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:31:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752126AbYKKRbQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:31:16 -0500 Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.177]:24100 "EHLO el-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751698AbYKKRbP (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:31:15 -0500 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id z25so1474164ele.1 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:31:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=seru1s/MoJ7s8TNPTX/MA8EHf8JTC138iKX6h4BDg1o=; b=ZYS6zDr7C2vRhUfGCO7sWL+DNOwKOdw8HpYQUxqvh2f0eMTxELHnbwx5cMSohT0thc HE1aLaxAOV4outpYP0SSOJXeVcykb0W+hJtDwZ4XpL8mu+DOtF4EGP16UfxFppxcsKR2 nLI0x7VyRW8IPdvqdf79WmFdMd/cK0Zn4GEns= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=vM6PuTx+zo1bjPt8/yaDx90hkRcw4WMfj4sL+P/0UjTZrx5fRt3WWliRv3oIkncLvS UBNhQ01eiH4fYn+e899uRG1Yb0slogCXbIAkP82+30A12sQD0cdfy4/BFa5NnJTdOBwf Ky9mp3RdnJ6EvRppo3jQZleqUIYN5UuSDHWPs= Received: by 10.151.148.2 with SMTP id a2mr12317760ybo.212.1226424674060; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:31:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.97.16 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:31:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20081111171816.GK2932@spearce.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:18, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > I don't know how the Eclipse foundation feels about distributing > LGPL in the IDE. One of our major reasons for going with a BSD > license on JGit was so the Eclipse Git team provider plugin could be > distributed alongside the CVS team provider, as part of the basic IDE > team provider package. We're clearly not ready for that wide of a > distribution, but it was a goal Robin and I set out for the project. Why not keep that as a goall? For now, you can stick with one of the existing LGPL implementations, later, when you want to have JGit distributed with Eclipse, you (or Johanness Schindelin when he has the time) write up your own Java version of it and license it BSD -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier