From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:40:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd6139dc0902160640n3a95223j71ae7f26bc0ff0b4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902160731420.14911@asgard.lang.hm>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 16:33, <david@lang.hm> wrote:
> if it is the correct thing to do with some workloads, it's not being
> deprecated. if it was deprecated then it is a capability that would be
> scheduled for complete removal, and nobody should ever use. not just the
> case where it needs to be used carefully, and you are putting in a warning
> about it.
Nitpicking much? The reasons why the warning/default-to-disallow are
being put in place have been explained, what value did your message
above add to the discussion? From my point of view it didn't add much,
if anything at all. It might be a good idea to end this thread here,
as Junio requested. If you feel the undying need to continue this
discussion, please do not do so in this thread.
Thank you.
--
Cheers,
Sverre Rabbelier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-16 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-15 21:31 [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 21:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 22:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-15 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 23:20 ` Heikki Orsila
2009-02-16 0:04 ` disallowing push to currently checked-out branch Jeff King
2009-02-16 1:33 ` david
2009-02-16 1:47 ` david
2009-02-16 1:30 ` Julian Phillips
2009-02-16 4:01 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 8:33 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-02-16 8:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 10:17 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 13:58 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 17:13 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 17:33 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-02-16 17:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 18:48 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 20:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 21:12 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 21:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 22:28 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 22:52 ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 5:53 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 11:28 ` PUSH_HEAD, was " Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 17:29 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 19:48 ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 22:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 22:42 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 22:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 19:24 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 20:09 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 21:42 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 0:07 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-17 0:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 0:41 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-17 0:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 1:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 0:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 21:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 22:43 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 23:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 0:23 ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 0:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 1:29 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 3:50 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 5:05 ` david
2009-02-16 4:05 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 5:18 ` david
2009-02-16 4:37 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 5:55 ` david
2009-02-16 5:06 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 10:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 10:50 ` dashed commands, was " Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:53 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible david
2009-02-15 23:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 0:14 ` david
2009-02-15 23:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 0:38 ` david
2009-02-16 0:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 10:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 15:33 ` david
2009-02-16 14:40 ` Sverre Rabbelier [this message]
2009-02-16 0:02 ` disallowing push to currently checked-out branch Jeff King
2009-02-16 10:06 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-15 23:01 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Jakub Narebski
2009-02-15 23:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:38 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-16 0:35 ` david
2009-02-16 0:07 ` send-email sending shallow threads by default Jeff King
2009-02-16 0:09 ` Pieter de Bie
2009-02-16 2:43 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 2:55 ` Brian Gernhardt
2009-02-16 9:56 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2009-02-16 7:55 ` SZEDER Gábor
2009-02-16 10:38 ` Martin Mares
2009-02-17 8:34 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-02-17 9:06 ` Martin Mares
2009-02-17 19:28 ` Jeff King
2009-02-20 3:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20 3:26 ` Jeff King
2009-02-20 4:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-17 8:30 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-02-16 1:27 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Sitaram Chamarty
2009-02-16 8:04 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-02-16 8:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 9:07 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-02-16 2:42 ` [RFC - draft #2] " Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 3:20 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 21:10 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd6139dc0902160640n3a95223j71ae7f26bc0ff0b4@mail.gmail.com \
--to=srabbelier@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).