From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
To: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expand explanation of the use of + in git push refspecs.
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:20:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd6139dc0902191020i787e56a7tbe88cedfc2cb4028@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090219180258.2C7983360A6@rincewind>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:39, Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> wrote:
> Documentation/git-push.txt | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Most of this is under examples, so I don't think this is cluttering
the man page too much.
> +is recommended only for private, unshared repositories.) See EXAMPLES
I don't know about this line, I reckon Junio has a + refspec for the
pu branch, that is, it's ok to use a + refspec if you let others know
that the branch may be 'rebased'.
> + branch. *This can abandon commits in the origin repository.*
I liked your wording with the commits becoming dangling better.
> +That is, commits A and B would belong to an unreachable branch without a
> +symbolic name.
Perhaps it would be better to say those commits "would no longer
belong to a branch with a symbolic name, and thus become unreachable"?
--
Cheers,
Sverre Rabbelier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-19 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-19 17:39 [PATCH] Expand explanation of the use of + in git push refspecs Marc Branchaud
2009-02-19 17:39 ` [PATCHv2] Docs: " Marc Branchaud
2009-02-24 17:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-19 18:20 ` Sverre Rabbelier [this message]
2009-02-20 5:10 ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano
2009-02-20 5:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-24 16:54 ` Marc Branchaud
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd6139dc0902191020i787e56a7tbe88cedfc2cb4028@mail.gmail.com \
--to=srabbelier@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).