From: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] http-push: refactor request url creation
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:49:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be6fef0d0901290349i65d75dfel49dda4ce0becf970@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4980D9FF.7020307@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> What's with these loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong lines?
>
> I thought at least you did not have these overlong lines in your earlier
> attempts, and Dscho may have acked one of those, but I doubt he would give
> his Ack to this one. I certainly wouldn't Ack it myself.
>
> By the way, aren't you sending format="flowed"? Please don't. It damages
> whitespaces.
I used Thunderbird since Gmail kept wrapping lines in the patch, guess
i"ll have to manually wrap the commit lines.
> Daniel Stenberg did a research on the safety of your "since curl stdrup's
> it" claim, and found that it unsafe for earlier versions of the library
> before 7.17.0.
>
> It seems that we earlier found out that anything older than 7.16 were not
> usable for git-http-push (see Release Notes for 1.5.4), but 7.16 is still
> older than 7.17, so either we declare you _must_ have 7.17 or newer to use
> http-push, or keep an extra copy around and free it later like the
> original code does.
>
> Even Debian is at 7.18.2 these days, so requiring 7.17 or newer may not be
> an issue in practice, but there are people who keep running things on
> older distros with proven stability (and known features limitation).
>
> The refactoring looked sane otherwise, but I think we would want to opt
> for safety by keeping an extra string around.
Hmm, since that string won't be released in start_fetch_loose, or
anywhere else, would this be considered a memory leak?
--
Cheers,
Ray Chuan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-28 22:19 [PATCH] http-push: refactor request url creation Tay Ray Chuan
2009-01-28 22:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-28 23:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-29 11:49 ` Tay Ray Chuan [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-30 23:51 Tay Ray Chuan
2009-02-01 0:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-01 22:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-25 6:08 Ray Chuan
2009-01-25 20:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-26 1:52 ` Ray Chuan
2009-01-26 8:02 ` Daniel Stenberg
2009-01-26 10:41 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-27 4:58 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be6fef0d0901290349i65d75dfel49dda4ce0becf970@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rctay89@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).