From: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>,
Sebastian Thiel <byronimo@gmail.com>,
Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-update-index: report(...) now flushes stdout after printing the report line
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:51:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be6fef0d1001051751p33c2f4a6r5b6f3fbbbeac9fa9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vwrzwoxh4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> from your above message solely and setting aside your original patch,
>> I presume that you want to introduce the ability to force progress
>> reporting even if stderr isn't a terminal.
>>
>> I am working a feature (display progress for http operations) that
>> happens to add this ability to git-push and git-fetch, by specifying
>> the --progress option.
>>
>> Regarding git-pull - I guess it's only git-fetch (being
>> transport-related) that reports progress?
>
> Are you talking about this topic?
>
> * tc/clone-v-progress (2009-12-26) 4 commits
> - clone: use --progress to force progress reporting
> - clone: set transport->verbose when -v/--verbose is used
> - git-clone.txt: reword description of progress behaviour
> - check stderr with isatty() instead of stdout when deciding to show progress
no, I'm not referring to that - the topic I mentioned is still off-list.
> What do people think about it? I vaguely recall that somebody asked to
> add a warning to release notes on the behaviour change to this series, and
> I think it may be a worthwhile thing to do (e.g. "Earlier we did X but now
> we do Y; change things in this way if you want us to keep doing X"), but
> otherwise I think it is a sensible change.
Yes, that request was from Dscho, and Miklos said something to that
effect as well. Could you advise how one could go about adding such a
warning, as I'm not sure about the release schedule details.
--
Cheers,
Ray Chuan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-19 21:17 [PATCH] git-update-index: report(...) now flushes stdout after printing the report line Sebastian Thiel
2009-12-30 13:41 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-12-30 19:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-30 13:56 ` Sebastian Thiel
2010-01-03 10:41 ` Sebastian Thiel
2010-01-03 23:03 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2010-01-04 10:30 ` Sebastian Thiel
2010-01-06 1:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06 1:51 ` Tay Ray Chuan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be6fef0d1001051751p33c2f4a6r5b6f3fbbbeac9fa9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rctay89@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=byronimo@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=nanako3@lavabit.com \
--cc=vmiklos@frugalware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).